AG Liz Murrill says litigation on Constitutional Amendment 2 is “frivolous,” and we totally concur and give our full-throttled support to Gov. Landry’s initiatives covered by that Amendment.

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry prepares to provide the introduction of his tax reform package to the Louisiana House Ways and Means Committee on November 7, 2024.

Sound Off Louisiana founder Robert Burns awoke this morning (Saturday, March 15, 2025) only to see an old friend, Foghorn Leghorn, staring right at him!

“Fog,” as Burns likes to call him, seemed very upset with Burns as evidenced by his hands directly on his hips as he stared Burns down.  Here’s dialogue between the two of them:

FOG:  “I say I say I say I got a bone I need to pick ‘wit you, Burns!”

BURNS:  “What’s wrong, Fog?”

 

FOG:  “I say I say I say you been up here on ‘dis here crusade ‘hooping and ‘hollering against my good friend, Jeff Landry.  I say I say I say you been a ‘preachin ‘bout how bad he is ‘wit that dog gone Police Commission!”

 

BURNS: “But, Fog, it’s all true.  I supplied the documents.”

 

FOG:  “I say I say I say I done told ever’body I know ’bout how corrupt ‘dat Commission is, but you ‘gotta say somthin’ good ‘bout my boy, Jeff, now.  You can’t be up here just a ‘railin ‘genst ‘da man!  I ain’t ‘gonna stand for it.  You hear me, boy?  I say I say I say, now get ‘yoself out ‘dere in front ‘dat ‘dere camera of ‘yose and say something good ‘bout my boy, Jeff!”

 

BURNS:  “Okay, Fog.  I can do that!  I don’t want you all upset with me!”

 

FOG:  “I say I say I say now ‘dats more like it.  Can’t wait to see what you ‘gonna say!”

 

So, with that, and in conformity with “Fog’s” admonition earlier this morning to Burns, here’s our latest feature providing our full-throttled support behind Gov. Landry’s Constitutional Amendment 2 (and all three of the other Amendments as well):

March 15, 2025:  Burns adheres to “Fog’s” admonition and touts why he believes voters should wholeheartedly support Constitutional Amendment Two on March 29, 2025 (as well as the other three Amendments on the ballot as well).

As stated in the feature, here is The Advocate article which we tout to explain the four amendments.  It enables anyone to do “homework” on the amendments, which is something attorney William Most, who has sued Secretary of State Nancy Landry over this Amendment, apparently doesn’t feel voters are capable of doing.

Also, here’s is the link for the quote of Pastor Tony Spell, which we reproduce here:

He (Spell) added that some religious organizations own rental housing with many units, for example.

“That’s why I’m concerned about it, because I own some of those properties,” he said.

So, with that, we urge voters to support Constitutional Amendment Two on the March 29, 2025 ballot (along with the other three Amendments as well).

Editor’s Note:

Burns dedicates this feature to the loving memory of his mom, who would have turned 94 only a few days ago.

During the time his mom spent in the nursing home directly across the street from he and his mother’s apartment, Burns would cross the street and visit three times a day every day (until Covid and, even thereafter, would go once a day with the fantastic folk at the nursing home being willing to wheelchair his mom to the door to where they could still visit, albeit with the glass door separating them).

For the eight (8) months prior to Covid, Burns would also take his mom out for a brief walk in Walden Subdivision, where she and he walked for decades.  His mom could not walk very far anymore, and she had to be supported at all times because her brain was susceptible to having a sudden blackout at which she would immediately collapse, so Burns had to be able to support her and immediately hug her tightly until that episode would run its course.

The nursing home would insist that a wheel chair be used to the point of the door, and Burns would always amuse his mom by doing his best Foghorn Leghorn impersonation and say, “I say I say I say I think it’s time for our walk, mom!  What do you say?”  She would typically always say, “You’re a mess, boy!”

Somehow, we think she’d be saying the exact same thing about the above feature!

God Bless You, Helen Yvonne Burns, for the 57 wonderful years you spent on this earth giving me the honor of being your son, and I look so very forward to the day when I see you again!

After heated exchanges between attorneys Craft and DuBos, State Police Commission agrees to favorable departure terms for former Trooper Gee after last-minute “cave” by Col. Hodges.

Louisiana State Police Commission (LSPC) Fifth Congressional District Representative Michael L. DuBos, at the LSPC meeting of Thursday, March 13, 2025, testily refutes the contention by attorney Jill Craft that he should recuse himself from any participation in any matter entailing her client, former Master Trooper Nicholas Gee.

It was only a month ago that we presented this feature in which attorney Jill Craft said LSP “freaked out” after a WBRZ news feature on Trooper Nicholas Gee.

Gee was the subject of a U. S. Attorney’s Office investigation of potential Veteran’s Administration fraud; however, he was never indicted nor arrested from the investigation.  Moreover, the U. S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Louisiana announced toward the middle of 2024 that it was not going to prosecute Gee (nor anyone else) in the matter.

At that meeting a month ago (February 13, 2025), Craft was seeking for the LSPC to simply award Gee his job back without the need for a hearing after stating that LSP Col.  Robert Hodges fired him in July of 2024.  The LSPC denied Craft’s Motion to Summarily award Gee his job back, and that set the stage for a full-blown hearing today (Thursday, March 13, 2025).

We have been attending LSPC meetings for just over eight (8) years now and videotaping all of them.  We have seen some things go down in these meetings, but we don’t think we’ve seen anything quite as bizarre as what transpired today!

First, when we published the above-linked feature, we had this to say:

To the extent there are future appeals wherein Craft serves as the attorney for a trooper, what we’re guaranteed is a friendly (for the most part) bantering between Craft and DuBos.

We say that because, as DuBos served as Defense Attorney for multiple Troopers from Troop F entailing alleged use of excessive force (including obtaining a Temporary Restraining Order blocking the Troopers’ administrative investigations as well as Federal Court jury acquittal of former Trooper Jacob Brown on alleged Civil Rights violations), it became very obvious to us that he has extensive knowledge of LSPC Rules and procedures and has obviously extensively defended police officers during his career.

Meanwhile, Craft, who has dedicated her entire legal career to government employee litigation, is the unquestioned legal authority on labor law, grievances, and whistleblower legal actions in Louisiana.  Thus, dialogue between Craft and DuBos at future meetings should be akin to a heavyweight boxing match between two very well-qualified fighters.

Well, our words proved prophetic as DuBos and Craft went at each other like two heavyweight boxers today except with neither of them having gloves and, unlike a month ago, it was anything but “friendly!”  They went at it!  Here’s the entire video of the Gee matter, which was dominated by the terse exchanges between Craft and DuBos.

3/13/25:  DuBos and Craft engage in terse exchanges about whether LSPC Member Michael DuBos (or, at one point, the entire Membership of the LSPC) should recuse himself (themselves) from the matter of the appeal of Master Trooper Nicholas Gee.

The above video depicts Col. Hodges apparently “caving” (the word used by multiple parties whom we consulted on today’s feature) at quite literally the last second (3:47 p.m. yesterday) and with his “caving” thereby permitting former Master Trooper Nicholas Gee to resign under some highly favorable (some have even said “lucrative”) terms.  That contention was fortified by the huge smile on Craft’s face at the conclusion of the proceeding!

What seems obvious to us from the above video is that Hodges placed the LSPC in a very awkward position:  buck a sitting LSP Colonel or do something the body was not very comfortable doing (approving the lucrative separation terms).

It’s our firm belief that the impetus to settle this matter came from LA-1, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry!

Why?  Because four (4) of the five (5) appointments Landry has made to the LSPC (one of which may have denied U. S. Congressional District 6 of any representation on the LSPC) still need Senate confirmation, and he did not want to risk alienating the Louisiana Legislative Black Caucus by sticking by Hodges’ decision to fire Gee.

 

Here are those four Commissioners whom the Senate must confirm at this upcoming Legislative Session which commences on April 14, 2025:

 

Lt. Gen. James M. Kowalski, USAF (Retired), Member
Represents: 4th Congressional District
Nominations from: Centenary College
Appointed: 10/16/2024
Term Expires: 12/05/2026

Mr. Stephen L. Guidry, Jr., Member (who already has his own confirmation issues)
Represents: 6th Congressional District
Nominations from: Xavier University
Appointed: 01/27/2025
Term Expires:12/05/2028

Mr. Jared J. Caruso-Riecke, Member (who also already has his own confirmation issues)
Represents: 1st Congressional District
Nominations from: Dillard University
Appointed: 01/10/2025
Term Expires: 12/05/2030

Mr. Michael L. DuBos, Member
Represents: 5th Congressional District
Nominations from: Loyola University
Appointed: 08/02/2024
Term Expires:12/05/2025

It would be hard to argue that Senate confirmation of these gentlemen would be much more difficult to obtain if the Legislative Black Caucus opposed any or all of the appointments.

Common sense also dictates that, especially with Gee being from Troop F and in light of the recent problems in Troop F regarding the use of excessive force on black citizens, the Legislative Black Caucus would have been miffed if Gee’s termination by Hodges had been upheld by the LSPC.

Thus, perhaps Gee lucked up, as one observer put it, “in just happening to be in the right position at the exact right moment!”

 

Is it a violation of Federal law to assert St. Tammany residency for LMVC purposes and EBRP for LSPC purposes and, if so, will the Louisiana Senate join in collusion?

Stephen L. Guidry, Jr., the Louisiana State Police Commission (LSPC)’s newest member, who purportedly represents U. S. Congressional District SIX (based on January 6, 2025 new voter registration in East Baton Rouge Parish – EBRP) but who continues to represent the Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission’s District ONE for which EBRP registration would not qualify him.

Today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature is a “cliff notes” version of our most recent feature.  Here it is:

3/8/25:  Overview of our most-recent feature.

 

 

Here are the documents, in order, referenced in the above feature:

 

First, Dr. Guillory’s nomination of Stephen L. Guidry, Jr., to represent U. S. Congressional District ONE on the Louisiana State Police Commission.

 

 

 

 

 

Second, Gov. Landry’s letter to Secretary of State Nancy Landry indicating that, the above letter notwithstanding, “Dillard University failed to nominate.”

 

 

 

Third, Louisiana Motor Vehicle Commission’s website which shows Guidry representing its FIRST District (parishes of Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, St. Tammany, and Washington):

 

 

 

Fourth and finally, Louisiana State Police Commission’s website which shows Guidry representing the U. S. Sixth Congressional District (which certainly does NOT include St. Tammany Parish but which does include EBRP):

 

That’s it in a nutshell, and we look forward to seeing if the Louisiana Senate opts to confirm either or both of these gentlemen under these circumstances!