3/30/25: Sound Off Louisiana’s Robert Burns provides assessment of the utter shellacking of Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on the March 29, 2025 ballot.
Here are links for points made in the video above:
As Burns stated on the video, the sun still rose this morning, but this was a legendary and monumental defeat the likes of which Burns hasn’t seen in his lifetime of observing Louisiana elections!
State Rep. Julie Emerson (R-Carencro) speaks at an Americans for Prosperity – Louisiana function in Lafayette on Wednesday, March 19, 2025 during which she addressed “rumors” that Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on the March 29, 2025 ballot entails taxation of church-owned property, a claim Emerson emphatically denies.
When we published this feature entailing our “full-throttled support” for Gov. Landry’s Constitutional Amendment Two (2), we briefly addressed in the video concerns from some members of the church community. Those concerns have centered around any potential taxation of church-owned property.
On Wednesday, March 19, 2025, we were invited to an Americans for Prosperity – Louisiana evening dinner featuring four Louisiana State Representatives to discuss Gov. Landry’s proposed Constitutional Amendment Two (2).
At that dinner engagement, Rep. Julie Emerson (R-Carencro), authoritatively shot down “rumors” that the Amendment would result in taxation of church-owned property.
This blog is video-based, and there’s no way we can adequately replicate in writing what Rep. Emerson said, so let’s present the segment of her presentation pertaining to the “rumors” concerning any church-owned property being subject to taxation, with her conceding that those rumors have been, “particularly challenging to me personally because of the way I was raised.” Here’s that video segment:
03/19/25: Rep. Emerson addresses “rumors” of church property taxation entailing Constitutional Amendment Two (2).
By now, you’ve likely seen claims that Amendment 2 (on your March 29 ballot) will somehow place property taxes on our churches. This just could not be further from the truth. Amendment 2 does not place any taxes on properties that are currently enjoying exemptions … and certainly not churches.
As it was making its way through the process, we were contacted by a few leaders of church organizations about concerns of placing those property tax exemptions in the tax code instead of the Constitution. I agreed that religious freedoms enjoyed special status and added specific language to the Constitution that I believe protects our churches and moved the language for all other nonprofits to the tax code, requiring a supermajority vote in both chambers of the legislature to change the statute (HB11, now Act 12) plus governor’s signature – and everyone, included church leaders who contacted us, seemed pleased.
Suddenly, a lawsuit was filed by a lawyer from New Orleans. I’ve never met him. It seems he’s probably a very intelligent attorney – graduating from Harvard, then the University of California at Berkeley Law School. I think it is important to point out that many of his associations seem to be what most would consider more on the liberal side.
I sincerely hope this lawsuit wasn’t just an attempt to stymie a Republican governor and legislature trying to enact positive reforms.
But genuine questions from some of our pastors and ministry leaders popped up as well.
So, allow me to share how some of our fellow conservative states handle church exemptions:
Alabama: constitutional protection for properties exclusively used for worship
Arkansas: constitutional protection for churches used as such (so as a church)
Florida: no constitutional exemption, a constitutional “allowance” for the legislature to enact in the tax code
Georgia: no constitutional exemption, the constitution requires a 2/3 vote of the legislature to repeal a religious property exemption in the tax code
Kentucky: constitutional protection for property owned by institutions of religion
Mississippi: no constitutional exemption, provided for in tax code
Tennessee: no constitutional exemption, a constitutional “allowance” for the legislature to enact in the tax code
Texas: no constitutional exemption, a constitutional “allowance” for the legislature to enact in the tax code
Importantly, churches have not faced an onslaught of tax assessments in these states, and there is absolutely no desire to see that happen in Louisiana either.
On a personal level, let me state unequivocally that I would never do anything to hurt our churches, because my faith life is important to me. I am a long time member of First Baptist Church in Lafayette, a board member of a Baptist seminary, and have a mother who has been in Christian education my entire life.
Rep. Emerson also explained the rationale for why the $2,000/year teacher pay raise (along with $1,000/year raise for support workers) was included in the Constitutional Amendment.
Again, she gave a fantastic explanation, and we would draw particular focus to her statements about incurring high-interest-rate debt to sit on low-earning assets.
With Sound Off Louisiana’s founder, Robert Burns, being an LSU Finance Major (albeit from 1985) and an inactive CPA, that type of financial (mis)management is appalling!
Let’s watch Emerson explain how passing this amendment will result in the State’s resources being much more efficiently managed and, in the process, provide for the teacher (and support worker) permanent pay raise:
3/19/25: Emerson indicates how daunting the task for Constitutional Amendment Two (2) has been and why the teacher (and support worker) pay raise was provided as part of that Amendment.
Finally, Emerson touted the increase in the Standard Deduction from $12,500 to $25,000 for Louisiana’s senior citizens:
3/19/25: Emerson touts Constitutional Amendment Two (2) raising the Standard Deduction for senior citizens from $12,500 to $25,000.
Remember, the election is one week from today on March 29, 2025 and, just for the record again, we reiterate our full-throttled support for Amendment # Two (2).
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill, who successfully sought the Louisiana Supreme Court to intervene in a lawsuit brought about by three plaintiffs represented by attorney William Most who sought to block Louisiana citizens from being able to vote on Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on Saturday, March 29, 2025.
It was only four (4) days ago that we published this feature revealing the fact that Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill characterized the litigation seeking to block Proposed Constitutional Amendment Two (2) from going to a vote of the people as “frivolous.”
We also indicated the Amendment has our “full-throttled support.”
In today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature, founder Robert Burns focuses in on the Supreme Court’s ruling last night and reiterates our “full-throttled support” for Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on the ballot for the March 29, 2025 election:
3/19/25: Burns coves the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling late yesterday tossing the legal challenge to Proposed Constitutional Amendment Two (2) on the ballot of Saturday, March 29, 2025.
We stress on the video that, contrary to attorney William Most’s apparent belief that Louisiana citizens lack the ability to, as Burns states it, “do their homework” and thereby make educated votes on the Proposed Amendment, modern technology permits a plethora of opportunities to become very well informed on the contents of all four (4) Amendment Proposals.
Further, as Burns stresses on the video, we are going to provide Dr. Steven Procopio, President of the Public Affairs Research Council providing an in-depth presentation of Proposed Amendment Two (2) which he provided to the Baton Rouge Press Club on Monday, February 24, 2025. We will note that we would have already done so, but we’ve had to waste valuable time and energy covering Most’s “frivolous” lawsuit. Here’s video coverage of Procopio’s coverage of Proposed Amendment Two (2) only:
2/24/25: Procopio provides an in-depth presentation of Proposed Amendment Two (2) on the ballot for March 29, 2025. [Note: the ONLY items we edited out of Procopio’s feature is one (1) question which he declined to answer because he indicated it would require him taking a position on the Amendment — rather than just providing information — and several questions entailing the litigation on the matter, which is now moot in light of yesterday evening’s Louisiana Supreme Court ruling].
We are about to present a mere 32-second excerpt from Procopio’s presentation which Sound Off Louisiana passionately believes is absolutely critical for Louisiana’s economic advancement and one of the biggest reasons we so strongly advocate for passage of the Proposed Amendment. Here is that 32-second segment:
2/24/25: Procopio provides what we passionately believe is one of the biggest reasons Proposed Constitutional Amendment Two (2) needs to pass on Saturday, March 29, 2025.
CLICK HERE for Procopio’s presentation in its entirety to include all four (4) Proposed Constitutional Amendments.
So, we conclude this feature by strongly commending Attorney General Liz Murrill for her tenacity in getting the lawsuit stopped dead in its tracks, as we also do to the Louisiana Supreme Court for stopping it dead in its tracks!
We believe the plethora of material by which voters can educate themselves on whether they support or oppose each of the four (4) Proposed Amendments does in fact make Most’s litigation “frivolous;” furthermore, it’s the rationale behind Burns stating on the first video above that the lawsuit constituted a, “slap in the face” to Louisiana voters because of its insulting premise that we don’t know how to educate ourselves on matters such as this!
