Asserting likely “home cooking” by Judge David Ritchie, Broussard apologizes to Gov. Landry for blaming him for $1 million loss; Expresses hope that Trump’s AI initiatives will prevent future occurrences.

Segment of court transcript in which 14th JDC Judge David Ritchie expresses his opinion of Gov. Landry’s legal skills in admonishing Billy Broussard to, “choose your lawyer carefully” in the future.

************** Editor’s Note:  In the original publication of this feature, we inadvertently failed to provide the documented proof that former GOHSEP Director Kevin Davis had been “briefed” on the Indian Bayou / Billy Broussard matter on Monday, June 29, 2015 at 11:02 a.m., a mere 2-1/2 hours prior to a meeting scheduled to be held at 1:30 p.m. that same day at then-Sen. Fred Mills’ office.  We have updated the feature to include that documented proof of the “briefing” from Mark DeBosier to Davis as placed on prominent display within this updated feature. **************

Today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature entails what we believe to be the best and most succinct arguments posed by Billy Broussard regarding the $1 million plus that he has alleged that he was cheated out of due to fraud which he alleges was perpetrated by several governmental officials associated with the now-non-existent Gravity Drainage District 8 of Ward 1 of Calcasieu Parish:

7/10/25:  Broussard makes formal apology to Gov. Landry and makes a direct correlation (which we assert is spot-on accurate) that he was the equivalent of Dr. William Blalock in the Shiva Akula Federal Medicare Fraud Case.

Here are links and support documents Broussard references in the video:

— Article entailing President Trump’s fight against massive Medicare fraud.   From that article:

The Trump Administration’s continuing fight against fraud, waste and abuse

The beginning of the second Trump administration brought the inception of DOGE and its tech-savvy staff tasked with finding fraud, waste, and abuse in government, including Medicare and Social Security.

HHS and CMS appear to be continuing DOGE’s mission with the introduction of an agreement among private insurance companies to “pledge to streamline and improve the prior authorization processes for Medicare Advantage, Medicaid Managed Care, Health Insurance Marketplace and commercial plans covering nearly eight out of 10 Americans.” Humana recently announced a plan to reduce prior authorizations by one-third and reduce wait times for others.

The introduction of the short list of Medicare services for prior authorization will test how well technologies such as machine learning and AI can streamline the prior authorization process. “CMS is committed to crushing fraud, waste, and abuse, and the WISeR Model will help root out waste in Original Medicare,” said CMS Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz.

As part of the goal of rooting out waste and fraud, the Justice Department conducted a 2025 National Health Care Fraud Takedown. Results were released on June 30, 2025, and included charges against more than 300 defendants who were accused of a range of health care fraud schemes.

One particular indictment can provide some insight as to how or why some of the procedures/services were selected for the list. In one particular case, three defendants in Arizona allegedly conspired to give elderly Medicare recipients unnecessary skin grafts, known as “amniotic wound allografts.” The defendants allegedly pocketed millions of dollars and billed for “more than over $1 billion in false and fraudulent claims to Medicare and other health benefit providers for these medically unnecessary allografts.” To make matters worse, according to the indictment, the defendants are alleged to have targeted Medicare beneficiaries, many of whom were terminally ill in hospice care.

The WISeR Model and how the program will work

The WISeR Model (Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction) is meant to test the use of enhanced technologies, such as AI and machine learning, to decrease “certain wasteful or low-value services shown to have little to no clinical, evidence-based benefit.” CMS chooses services that “have been identified as particularly vulnerable to fraud, waste, and abuse, or inappropriate use.”

— Our coverage of Dr. Blalock’s testimony at Dr. Akula’s trial.  We firmly believe that Broussard’s direct comparison of himself to Dr. Blalock  is spot-on accurate!

— Here’s a copy of the business card which Kirk Harmon supplied to Billy Broussard, and it was Harmon who marked and directed all of the debris which Broussard removed from Indian Bayou:

Kirk Harmon’s business card, who represented himself as a GOHSEP monitor and who marked and ordered Broussard to remove all of the debris he removed in the Indian Bayou Project.

In our opinion, very, very importantly, as evidenced by the 1:19 – 1:31 mark of this video,  Mr. Michael Duane Higdon, who was a self-proclaimed monitor on the Indian Bayou project, states:  “I was a monitor, and actually what they hired me for was to shuttle Kirk Harmon, the State Inspector, back and forth by boat.”  We don’t see how there can be any greater proof that, not only did Broussard rely upon the orders of Harmon in removing the debris he was ordered and directed to remove, but so did Higdon, who readily admitted that he was hired for the sole purpose of “shuttlling Harmon (who he himself identified as a “state monitor“) back and forth by boat!”

— Additional context of 14th JDC Judge David Ritchie’s thoughts on Gov. Landry’s legal skills.

— The 2006 flooding Broussard references in the video above.  Broussard strongly contends that flooding was falsely attributed to Hurricane Rita debris when, in reality, the flooding resulted from neglect to maintain the waterways which allowed sinker cypress trees to accumulate in significant quantities that impeded the flow of water and which he subsequently cleared at the direct order of Kirk Harmon.

— Details of the obvious gift-card money laundering operation being conducted by then-Calcasieu Parish DA John DeRosier simultaneous to the timeframe in which he was charged with investigating the matter entailing Billy Broussard (which Broussard maintains he had an obvious conflict in that he represented the now-non-existent Drainage District).

— The email to Kirk Harmon which demonstrates clearly that another Project Worksheet Version would be required for all of the additional debris being uncovered and the need for obtaining the new version so as to, “keep the contractor (Broussard) from having to stop and wait on orders.”  We would note that Broussard did in fact have to cease all work for about approximately three (3) weeks before being instructed to resume debris removal operations:

Email from Harmon to Crabb wherein he openly states, “With the job about 10% complete, and 200 CY (cubic yards) total, I believe the estimate on the FEMA assessment of 850 CY (cubic yards) is going to come in very low.  When they reach a blockage or a tree in the canal to be cleared, they are finding two to three additional trees below the water line.”

The above email from Mark DeBosier to Kevin Davis (which contained only the attachment which is displayed next) demonstrates Broussard’s point that Davis was “briefed” on the Indian Bayou matter literally hours before the meeting between Broussard, then-Sen. Fred Mills, and Davis.  Further, in the attachment which follows, DeBosier clearly identifies an additional $453,000 in additional eligible debris which Broussard removed from the Bayou, yet he was never paid for doing so.

Then Sen. Fred Mills setting up the meeting between Davis, Mills, and Broussard (note that Davis responded with, “need Mark Riley to get info,” when what he meant was, “need Mark DeBosier to get info,” which is what caused the “briefing document” to be created as illustrated above.

Then Sen. Fred Mills’ office confirming the meeting to transpire on Monday, June 29, 2015 at 1:30 p.m.  Unbeknownst to Broussard on the day of the meeting, Davis had been “briefed” on the matter 2-1/2 hours before as evidenced by the email from DeBosier to Davis sent at 11:02 a.m. that same day.

The above video was taped on July 10, 2025.  Near the end of the video, Burns and Broussard allude to the vacancy on the Louisiana State Police Commission (LSPC) as a result of Jared Caruso-Riecke’s May 23, 2015 resignation from the LSPC.

Broussard openly states that he has seen the three (3) nominations made by Dillard University President Monique Guillory which she submitted on June 20, 2025.  Broussard even stated his glee that Clyde Construction’s CEO Jonathan Kernion would be the one Gov. Landry tapped to fill the Riecke vacancy.  Operating under the belief that Gov. Landry still had ten (10) days left to make his selection, however, Burns cautioned him not to get out in front of Gov. Landry.

What Burns did not know at the time of that filming is that Gov. Landry had already made his selection of Kernion on June 21, 2025, one day after Guillory submitted his name for consideration.

Kernion should be sworn in on Thursday, August 14, 2025; however, Burns will not be present for the swearing in because he has an ophthalmology appointment in Houston that morning.

Regarding the LSPC, however, a significant number of both troopers and retired troopers have stated to us that LSPC Chairman Monty Montelongo needs to “resign immediately” as a result of his role in the Major Donavan Archote meal gate scandal.  It was Montelongo who approved all of the meal purchases, and sources guided us to Page 23 of the Louisiana Division of Administration travel policy regarding “special meals.”

Anyone is welcome to click on the link and view the requirements for such “special meals,” but it only takes a minute to see that LSP was in very obvious violation of many of the provisions of that section of the policy, not the least of which is that they should have gotten Division of Administration prior approval for the purchase of the meals.

One source had this to say:  “DPS does not have the authority to approve a purchase of this type with state issued funds so that memo is useless.”

The source was referencing the approval memos signed off by LTC Hasselback contained within the above-linked “meal gate scandal” feature.

For what it’s worth, we agree with the troopers’ calls for Montelongo’s immediate resignation, and we’ll see if Col. Hodges opts to call for his LSPC resignation similarly to the way former Col. Reeves called upon former LSPC Chairman T. J. Doss to resign immediately after the little “afternoon delight” rendezvous between then-Chairman Doss and then-Vice Chairman Monica Manzella.

Should Hodges fail to do so, to us, it can only mean one of two things:  #1) he has no real desire to insist upon integrity of those under him, particularly to be the Chairman of the very Commission which passes judgment upon other troopers, or #2) Hodges’ own hands are tied because he is an integral part of the lack of integrity within LSP.  That’s our assessment for what it’s worth.

 

EMS Reform’s Beach applauds Mayor Edwards’ proposal for BR General to operate ambulances but says merger of EMS with BR Fire is a “money grab and waste of taxpayer dollars.”

EMS Reform Co-founder Walter Beach.

Today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature is a very informative interview with Walter Beach, who is the co-founder of EMS Reform, who contends that the Louisiana Legislature promotes monopolies of EMS services via LA R. S. 4791.1(D) which states:

Any municipality or other local governing authority is authorized to carry out the provisions of this Section as acts of government on behalf of the state as sovereign and, to the extent the governing authority deems necessary or appropriate, is further authorized to displace competition and provide a monopoly public service. All immunity of the state of Louisiana from liability under antitrust law is hereby extended to any municipality or other governing authority acting within the scope of authority contained in this Section and, when so acting, a municipality or other local governing authority shall be presumed to be acting in furtherance of state policy.

We fully expect to have Beach on Sound Off Louisiana as part of an ongoing series, but for this interview, his focus was primarily upon EBRP Mayor President Sid Edwards’ plan to allow Baton Rouge General Hospital to provide ambulance services, for which Beach applauds Edwards and controversies around Edwards’ plan to merge EBRP EMS with the BR Fire Department.  Here’s our interview with Beach:

August 6, 2025:  Beach provides his thoughts on Edwards’ proposal to allow Baton Rouge General Hospital to provide ambulance services and his proposal to merge EBRP EMS with BR Fire.

Here are highlights from the above-linked Advocate articles:

BRGH providing ambulance services:

For decades, Acadian Ambulance has provided the lion’s share of ambulance services not handled by East Baton Rouge’s own Emergency Medical Services, transporting patients from facilities like hospitals, nursing homes, assisted living centers and more in the parish.

But now, Mayor-President Sid Edwards has opened the door for a competitor, allowing Baton Rouge General to enter the market.

“We are excited about the opportunity to better support patients in Baton Rouge and help ensure they get where they need to go quickly,” said Meghan Parrish, Vice President of Marketing and Communications.

Edwards made the decision over protests from Acadian, which argues city-parish ordinances require the mayor to consider “whether the public convenience and necessity require,” a new ambulance service.

“We definitely did not like the way it was done, because it did not follow the ordinance,” said Acadian Director of Operations Porter Taylor.

Still, Taylor added that the company is “not interested in making it messy.”

According to Taylor and Acadian, no need for an additional provider exists.

” … it appears that Baton Rouge General’s intentions are self-serving,” he wrote. “To my knowledge, there have been no other health care entities in this parish that have expressed a need for additional ambulance services, including your own municipal EMS.”

On July 14, Edwards issued a letter to BRG granting a request to apply for an ambulance service for nonemergency calls and emergencies when requested by city-parish EMS.

Merger of EBRP EMS with BR Fire:

With Baton Rouge EMS workers pushing back on a recent announcement that their department will be merging with the city’s Fire Department, the mayor and emergency services leaders are trying to calm those anxieties.

But after a town hall meeting Tuesday led by East Baton Rouge Parish Mayor-President Sid Edwards, EMS Director Chris Landry and BRFD Chief Michael Kimble, many of the EMS workers still expressed frustration.

At the meeting, which originally was meant to be closed but which Edwards decided to open to reporters, officials said no jobs or promotion structure will be lost, and EMS will keep control of its funding.

And while Landry, Edwards and others tried to put workers at ease, many EMS workers continued to voice their opposition to the merger.

“We need support, we do not need a merger,” said Emergency Medical Technician Amber Munch. “EMS has our own problems, just like everyone else, but the fire department is not the answer to those problems. Support is.”

Since the merger was announced in June, EMS workers have voiced concerns about their positions and benefits, wondering if cuts would take place.

Kimble said there has been a lot of “misinformation” on those subjects over the past month or so.

The back-and-forth between workers and officials remained mostly civil, though tensions rose as many EMS workers repeatedly asked why the merger was happening.

“Because I want it,” the mayor finally said.

Paramedic Association President Janice Willard said officials didn’t have answers to many of the questions EMS workers were asking.

“It was a lot of dancing around questions, not really answering anything,” Willard said. “I could see a lot of people in the audience, especially from EMS, very frustrated. And a lot of people got up and left. I think that says a lot.”

Before the meeting ended, one worker asked the mayor if the merger was a done deal.

Edwards replied and said he wants it to move forward and the process, but conceded that “If it was 100%, I wouldn’t have wasted my time coming.”

“I still feel strong about it happening,” Edwards said. “But to answer your question: no. I’m listening to you … Because look, anytime you come in to try and change something … people get very uncomfortable.”

As Burns states on the video, this matter is, “not going to be resolved in a week,” and we look forward to having Beach return as this process advances further along.

Furthermore, as Burns also states on the video, Edwards and/or his representatives are more than welcome to engage in a Sound Off Louisiana feature to present his side of this matter.  As always, we will be more than happy to accommodate.

 

With reports surfacing that, “every trooper assigned to Troop NOLA made over $200,000 in 2024,” and retired troopers “furious” over $11,000+ in food orders from Major Donavan Archote’s restaurants, LSP stalls multiple public records requests we’ve submitted.

Partial receipt from Dough Nguyener’s Bakery, reportedly owned by Louisiana State Police (LSP) Major Donavan Archote (Region NOLA Command Inspector) on January 1, 2025 to feed LSP troopers on the day of the terrorist attack in New Orleans.  LSP would subsequently purchase another $10,725.25 from restaurants reportedly owned by Archote through June 1, 2025.

————————————————-

Editor’s Note (7/30/25 @ 11:14 a.m.):

This feature has generated thousands of hits and well over 1,000 Facebook shares.  We received numerous statements that essentially stated that overtime was being utilized to jack up the final three years of salaries of some troopers for retirement purposes.  Accordingly, we reached out to the Louisiana State Police Retirement Board Executive Director, Ms. Margaret Michel, to inquire if that could transpire.  Ms. Michel could not have been more prompt and concise in her reply back to us.

The one word answer is “no!”  Ms. Michel  also supplied LA R. S. 1310 (A)(1) to document the fact that the answer is “no.”  From that Statute:  “For the purposes of computation, “average salary” shall not include overtime, expenses, or clothing allowances.”

We were also asked to contact Louisiana State Police Commission Executive Director Jason Hannaman and inquire as to whether there is any provision in place to permit LSP personnel at the rank of Captain and above to earn overtime in apparent contravention to LSPC Rules and/or LSP policy.  We reached out yesterday, July 29, 2025 and here is what he reported back on Monday, August 4, 2025:

Good afternoon, Mr. Burns,

 

In 2019, the LSP appointing authority petitioned the State Police Commission for authority under SPC Rule 6.27: Exceptions to the Overtime Rules. The request sought approval to compensate all non-exempt and exempt State Police personnel at the time-and-one-half rate for events declared an official State of Emergency by the Governor or activated at Level 3 or above by the State Emergency Operations Center, effective June 1, 2019. The Commission approved this request at its general business meeting on May 23, 2019, and that authority remains in effect.”

We reached out to an individual with integral knowledge of LSP affairs and asked if the above statement by Hannaman means that Gov. Landry would have to declare a State of Emergency in order for LSP Troopers with the rank of Captain and above to be able to earn overtime compensation.  Here is his response:

Yes for captains and above to go earn at the 1.5 an hour rate. Not the 75 an hour escort detail rate.  However, the emergency declaration has long passed and the argument it hasn’t been rescinded when the emergency declaration was rescinded is comical.

——————————————–

When we published our last feature, we openly questioned if the recent settlement of the Braxton v. Louisiana State Trooper’s Association (LSTA) et. al. litigation (at least by Defendant LSTA – former LSP LTC Jay Oliphant remains as a Defendant) would be a topic of discussion at the business meeting of the LSTA’s recent convention.

We have no idea whether the Braxton matter was even discussed (though one recently-retired trooper told us there was “no way” anyone would be brave enough to bring that topic up), what we do know is that, among retired LSP troopers, the topic de jour was these $11,000+ in meal purchases made by the newly-formed “Troop NOLA” during several recent events:  the terrorist incident on January 1, the Superbowl, Mardi Gras, and the prison escape of 10 inmates in May.

We knew nothing of these purchases prior to the convention; however, soon after the convention, we were contacted and notified that retired troopers were “furious” that the $11,000 in meal purchases were all directed to be made from “Major Donovan Archote’s restaurants.”  Here is the position Archote holds from the just-linked LSP webpage:

Region NOLA

Major Donovan Archote
Region NOLA Command Inspector

478 S. Johnson Street, Suite 150
New Orleans, LA 70112
Phone:504-635-4400

Region NOLA is headquartered in New Orleans, LA. Geographically, it encompasses six (6) parishes and includes the city of New Orleans. It is bordered on the south by the Gulf of Mexico and on the east by the state of Mississippi.

Within the Region NOLA command structure are two State Police Troops, each commanded by a State Police Captain:

Troop B
Kenner, LA – Captain Joseph W. Piglia
Jefferson · Plaquemines · St. Bernard · St. Charles · St. John the Baptist

Troop NOLA
New Orleans, LA – Captain Rodney Hyatt
Orleans

What the above caption from LSP’s website is missing is the fact that Louisiana State Police Commission (LSPC) Chairman Lt. Monty Montelongo (one of only two authorities to whom LSTA members could submit questions long before the convention, with the other being LSP Colonel Robert Hodges) serves as the Executive Officer (XO) of Troop NOLA, and he is the one who approved all of the above-linked purchases from restaurants  Archote allegedly owns.  Montelongo’s position is itemized, however, on the “Troop NOLA” link provided within the above LSP webpage.

These retired troopers didn’t hold back the fact that they are “furious” over what transpired in this matter.  In fact, one recently-retired trooper told us that Montelongo is being groomed to be the eventual Captain of Troop NOLA, and he asserted that, by authorizing these payments to be made to an individual superior in rank to him at the same Region (NOLA), he (Montelongo) is, “playing the political game exactly the way he needs to in order to eventually obtain that position of Captain of Troop NOLA.”

Now, as is apparent from this memo, Troop NOLA food purchases (at least in generic form without specifying from any particular vendor) were approved on January 14, 2025.

More recently, such approval has been granted for similar purchases for Troop B (which, as explained above, is the other component of “Region NOLA”).  Here’s evidence of that approval:

 

It’s interesting to note that the request for approval is submitted by Archote who, at the time of making that request, was already the beneficiary of $11,000 in food purchases made by Troop NOLA to restaurants that he and his wife, Betty, allegedly own.

Site visitors may recall our October 22, 2023 feature expressing concerns that troopers had that Gov.-Elect Jeff Landry would choose Frank Besson (a/k/a “Edmonson 2.0”) as the next LSP Colonel.  Those troopers expressed to us that Besson, who was ultimately chosen for the position of LSP Chief of Staff with that being the person historically designated to make the day-to-day calls and decisions on running LSP, would simply reward “Edmonson’s cronies” and simply continue LSP’s downward spiral they assert originated during Edmonson’s tenure.

The moment Besson (or Hodges) named Rodney Hyatt as the new Captain of the newly formed Troop NOLA, we got tons of correspondence indicating that Hyatt’s appointment constituted the “strongest evidence” to date that Edmonson’s cronies continued to be elevated under the current regime.

Long-time visitors to our site may recall Hyatt as being one of the troopers caught up in the “Las Vegas Gate” that ultimately caused Edmonson’s downfall.  Many troopers have referenced Hyatt as a “clown” who is in so far over his head in his current role that he will simply go along with whatever may be asked of him to reward those in the prior “Edmonson clique” to obtain perks such as that bestowed upon Archote and highly-elevated salaries allegedly obtained via excessive overtime (more on that shortly).

For those who aren’t longer-term visitors to our site, here is video of Hyatt having to explain his participation in “Las Vegas Gate:”

7/16/18:  43-minute highlight video of Hyatt’s testimony before the LSPC entailing “Las Vegas Gate” (Note: Click Here for the totality of Hyatt’s 3-1/2 hours of testimony entailing “Las Vegas Gate.”)

A few paragraphs above, we said we would soon demonstrate that the final meal purchase was made on June 1, 2025.  We realize not many folk are going to go through 76 pages of invoices and related processing documentation for all of the meal purchases, so we took the time to prepare this one-page summation of all of those purchases.  Let us also go ahead and place that document front and center:

We’re going to consider that a wrap for presenting retired troopers’ concerns over the meal purchases to the benefit of restaurants allegedly owned by Archote, but we feel compelled to present another matter that both current troopers and retired troopers are extremely angry about, and that is alleged inflated salaries at Troop NOLA accomplished via excessive overtime doled out by Hyatt and/or Montelongo.

Specifically, we were told in late March or early April that, “every trooper assigned to Troop NOLA was paid in excess of $200,000 in 2024.”

We have been seeking to substantiate these allegations; however, Hodges and Besson seem hell bent on thwarting all of our efforts to substantiate the troopers’ claims.

Given the high level of credibility of these sources, however, we are going ahead and declaring their claims of every Troop NOLA trooper making in excess of $200,000 in 2024 to be true, and the onus is now officially upon LSP to present documentation to refute the troopers’ statements to us.

First, however, let’s present the following table to document the extent to which Hodges and Besson have ducked and dived in trying to avoid providing documentation which we believe is all but certain to substantiate the troopers’ claims (anyone is welcome to view that ducking and diving by clicking here):

Date of PRR Run-AroundAction of PRR Run-Around
April 4, 2025.We request: "Documentation evidencing the total compensation for the calendar year 2024 for each trooper assigned to Troop N."
June 16, 2025 (63 days after our request and having gotten zilch in the way of a response beyond the standard boiler plate automated response of "45 days.")We send the following notation: "I am just sending to seek an update on the amount of time it may be before this request may be expected to be fulfilled since it has now been 73 days since I received the below automated response. [Note: Should have been 63 days and 73 was a typo].
June 18, 2025.LSP responds to our inquiry with the following: "There are no responsive record(s) to your request. Troop N was not in formation in 2024."
June 18, 2025 (after our sources indicated, "They are just being a$$ holes. They know what you meant!")We respond with the following notation: "Please replace 'Troop N' in my request with 'Troop NOLA,' and I respectfully ask that my request be expedited because you took 77 days to tell me what you did below and did so then only because I prodded you for a response!!"
June 20, 2025.LSP responds with the following: ""*****Please submit a new Public Records Request.*****"
June 23, 2025.We submit a new public records request with LSP responding with the following: "Records Requested: Documentation evidencing the total compensation for the calendar year
2024 for each trooper assigned to Troop NOLA." LSP also included the standard 45-day automated estimated timeframe for fulfilling the records request.
June 30, 2025.LSP sends the following notation: "Please clarify what is meant by 'total compensation?' Please specifically state what you meant by
the use of the word 'compensation'."
June 30, 2025.We respond to LSP's latest communication with this definition of "compensation:" "For purposes of this public records request, “compensation” is defined as gross earnings from: 1) regular hours worked, 2) overtime hours worked, 3) annual leave taken, 4) sick leave taken, and 5) administrative leave taken."

We’re not sure what purpose stalling us out serves because there is no question whatsoever that the salaries of those folk assigned to Troop NOLA are public record; furthermore, as evidenced by this entry on Open Payrolls for Montelongo’s salary for 2023, it won’t be long before 2024 salaries will be easily and readily available for those troopers.  Here’s what Open Payrolls divulges for Montelongo for 2023:

State of Louisiana records show Monty C Montelongo held multiple jobs between 2018 and 2023. One of the most recent records in 2023 lists a job of State Police Lieutenant and a pay of $106,962.96. This is 115.0 percent higher than the average pay for co-workers and 49.1 percent higher than the national average for government employees. The highest paying job held by Monty C Montelongo was in 2021 as a State Police Sergeant making $115,831.86.

As is readily apparent, the above excerpt reveals that Montelongo made more in 2021 than in 2023, and that can only be via overtime.  Our trooper sources have told us that Hodges and Besson don’t want the public to see that Hyatt and/or Montelongo scheduled massive overtime for those assigned to Troop NOLA, and that is what is going to cause the requested records to reflect those troopers making in excess of $200,000 each in 2024.  One recently retired trooper had this to say:  “Hyatt, who should have been fired, made $206,000 in 2024.  Archote made $210,000 the same year.”

We’ve also been told that, “Captain and above are not allowed OT (overtime) by policy.  They are salary only but can claim comp time for extra hours.”  That source referred to it as “criminal” for all the troopers at Troop NOLA to have made over $200,000 in 2024.

One of our sources also said:  “Supposedly they got an exemption from Hodges to work overtime.  I believe it’s in the LSPC rules that Captain and above can’t make OT (overtime). It’s definitely in policy!”

Incredibly, we were informed that, very soon after the public records request of April 4, 2025 above, suddenly, “they’re cutting back overtime in NOLA.”  We’ll make a public records request a few months from now to ascertain if such a cutback in overtime did in fact occur around the April 4, 2025 timeframe.

For those troopers who have inquired if we intend to just let the Hodges/Besson stall of our request continue indefinitely, the answer is an emphatic “no!”  We have already reached out to an attorney to represent us in the matter; however, she is presently out on maternity leave.  Once she returns, which is not far off, we intend to retain her to represent us in pursuing the records.

Also, we have two other pending public records requests with LSP and, on one of them, LSP has not communicated anything to us beyond the fact that they received it and that, “You will be notified when the status changes.”  When we say “nothing,” we mean “nothing.”  Obviously, that is completely out of conformity with Louisiana’s Public Records Laws, and we have no doubt that there is a battle royale transpiring between Besson and/or Hodges (who clearly don’t want the requested document made public) and LSP Legal Counsel Faye Morrison, who knows full well there is no statutory provision by which she can deny us obtaining that particular record.

The final public records request is too recent to take legal action upon; however, all of these requests will be lumped together in a lawsuit against LSP should that end up being necessary once the young lady returns from maternity leave.

Perhaps the rationale for Hodges stalling out our public records request lies in the fact that numerous sources have told us that Hodges has been nominated as the U. S. Marshal of the Eastern District of the LA Office (though one source has indicated that Hodges has reportedly turned the position down).  If he has not turned the position down, perhaps he doesn’t want the alleged abuses of taxpayer funds attributed to Troop NOLA to be made public if such revelations may cause him not to obtain the position, which we’re told would entail him having more power than he presently possesses at LSP.

We guess we’ll just have to see how the purported shenanigans allegedly transpiring at Troop NOLA play out in coming weeks and months as we await several pending public records requests which LSP clearly doesn’t want to release to us.