Broussard contends LSP’s investigators conducted a half-hearted review, inferred he “fabricated” documents and further asserts GOHSEP’s Lynne Browning was briefed on $453,000 owed him but later feigned ignorance of any such briefing.

Text sent from LSP Col. Robert Hodges to Billy Broussard on Tuesday, November 12, 2024 at 12:20 p.m.

In today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature, Billy Broussard alleges that LSP Col. Robert Hodges, after being prodded by Louisiana Senator (and candidate for U. S. Senate) Blake Miguez’s seeking a Baton Rouge-based investigation, instructed LSP Lt. William Bosworth and Sgt. Benjamin Friedmann to conduct, “an independent and objective investigation” (See feature photo at the top of this feature).

That “investigation,” which Bosworth and Friedmann insist was never intended to be more than a “review,” was, according to Broussard, intended to focus on his allegations that the now-defunct Gravity Drainage District 8 of Ward 1 of Calcasieu Parish very likely committed FEMA fraud, definitively lied to Louisiana Governor’s Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness (GOHSEP) officials and, in the process, cheated him out of over $1 million in debris cleanup efforts in the aftermath of Hurricane Rita.

Broussard alleges that, in contrast to Col. Hodges’ admonition, Bosworth and Friedmann conducted a half-hearted investigation with a mission of seeking to close the file as quickly as possible.  As is evident in a segment of the video below, Broussard also asserts that, in seeking to close the file as quickly as possible,  Bossworth and Freidmann strongly insinuated that Broussard “fabricated documents.”  Here’s video of Broussard’s contentions, including his exchange with the two investigators over the authenticity of a “chronology document.”:

Broussard outlines his arguments that Bosworth and Friedmann conducted a half-hearted investigation (they claim mere “review”) which he claims differs significantly from Col. Hodges’ assertion that an “independent and objective” investigation of his matter be conducted.  He also challenges both gentlemen regarding whether they are implicitly suggesting that he “fabricated documents” which he provided to them.

On November 19, 2024, Sound Off Louisiana founder Robert Burns made the following Public Records Request of LSP:

The Louisiana Department of Public Safety, Public Safety Services received a public records request from you on November 19, 2024. Your request mentioned:

On or about Tuesday, November 12, 2024, LSP Col. Robert Hodges sent the attached text message [see above photo] to Billy Broussard. In light of the content of the text message, I make formal public records request for the following items pertaining to that attached text message:

1. Any documentation evidencing the subject matter that was reviewed and/or investigated;
2. Any documentation itemizing the name and position of individual(s) at LSP who instructed the scope of the investigation and/or review;
3. Any video or audio recordings pertaining to the investigation and/or review;
4. Documentation itemizing the list of individuals with whom the individuals itemized in item # 2 above correspondence with during the course of the investigation and/or review;
5. The names of any and all investigators who have had involvement in this matter;
6. Documentation evidencing the names of individuals at the East Baton Rouge District Attorney’s Office who interacted with LSP during the course of this investigation and/or review;
7. Any documentation evidencing communications with any judges during the duration of this investigation and/or review;
8. Documentation evidencing the names of any individuals with GOHSEP and/or FEMA with whom any LSP officials corresponded during the duration of this investigation and/or review.

On Wednesday, January 8, 2025, LSP responded with the following records:

1.  The .jpg photo depicted above (Hodges’ text) which Burns himself supplied on 11/19/24.

2.  This initial interview with Broussard on August 27, 2024 @ 5:18 p.m. entailing LSP Lt. William Bosworth and Sergeant Benjamin S. Friedmann.

3.  This “final call” to Broussard on September 16, “2021” @ 2:11 p.m. (that date should have stated “2024,” and NOT 2021), 20 days after the initial call above, entailing LSP Lt. William Bosworth and Sergeant Benjamin S. Friedmann.

Entailing Broussard’s core assertion, there most certainly does seem to be a clear discrepancy between Hodges’ text indicating that an “independent and objective investigation” transpired vs. a mere “review.”  After all, on the audio recordings above, Bosworth and Friedmann do not mince their words in stating point-blank to Broussard:  “We did not do any investigation.

Irrespective of whether (being kind) a half-hearted investigation transpired or a mere “review,” we feel compelled to draw attention to a few points we made note of entailing the audio files linked above:

— DeBosier’s first name (Mark) can’t be recalled by the investigators; furthermore, they botch the pronunciation of his last name (it’s de-bos-your and not de-bows-e-a).

—  They botch Plaia’s last name even far worse than DeBosier’s.  They pronounce Plaia’s last name as “pa-lee-a” when his last name is pronounced “ply-ah.”

— They claim they “forwarded” the document to Plaia and DeBosier, yet our public records request could not substantiate any such email forwarding.

— No recordings, or even hand-written notes (or typed notes) of any correspondence with Plaia or DeBosier were in LSP’s possession.

That’s our observations, and we’ll let our site visitors make up their own minds regarding the diligence level of any “investigation” or even the level of diligence of a “review” that took place entailing Broussard’s matter.

Of course, there’s one recording of DeBosier which nobody can deny!  That would be his infamous bragging of his ability to get folk at the Legislative Auditor’s Office to “stick their fingers in their ears, close their eyes, and we make sure there are no fingerprints on it.”

That is a recording which Broussard himself sprung upon everyone in the room at a meeting at the Legislative Auditor’s Office on February 10, 2019.

Lynne Browning, who was the Deputy Director of GOHSEP at the time (she remains with GOHSEP to this day) made her own interesting commentary in that meeting, and we want to revisit it:

Browning explains why fraud is inevitable (and seemingly acceptable), after which Broussard drops this bombshell recording of former GOHSEP’s Deputy Director Mark DeBosier bragging of his ability to get the Legislative Auditor’s Office to, “close their eyes, stick their fingers in their ears, and we make sure there’s no fingerprints on it.”  As Broussard contends that he has uncovered irrefutable evidence that Browning had been “fully briefed” on the email(s) demonstrating he’d been cheated out of $453,000 (he contends much more, but that’s a written admission, Broussard contends) and Broussard is particularly disturbed that, with his added knowledge that Browning had been “fully briefed” on the matter, her opening words in the above video seem to imply there’s no choice but to give a wink and a nod to the fraud Broussard asserts transpired on the Hurricane Rita recovery work.

Now, there is a document that Bosworth and Friedmann stated that they reviewed with DeBosier and Plaia “line by line” in the above-linked audio files.  What is that document?

Well, that would be this “chronology document” from Mark DeBosier to Ben Plaia sent on Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 9:14 a.m.

Bosworth and Friedmann said that they were unable to “authenticate” the document and, therefore, they were, “closing the file.”

Now, regarding Broussard’s contention that Browning was briefed, here’s that email of Monday, June 29, 2015 clearly demonstrating Browning was briefed on the $453,000 in “additional work” for which Broussard alleges he should have been paid not only that full amount, but much more!

We should note that Broussard has asserted from the day Sound Off Louisiana’s Burns first met him, that, on Monday, June 29, 2015, then-GOHSEP Director, Kevin Davis, allegedly stated, upon seeing the proof that Broussard had been denied a massive amount of money ($1 million +) in the aftermath of Hurricane Rita disaster recovery, “We can fix this!”

Broussard contends that, Browning’s very obvious “briefing” on his matter  notwithstanding, 3-1/2 years later, at that meeting at the Legislative Auditor’s Office, she never gave the slightest hint that she had ever been privy to that briefing and the damning portrayal that document Broussard supplied to Bosworth and Friedmann paints of parties involved in negotiations with FEMA and/or GOHSEP.

At any rate, it has now been 3,796 days since that infamous meeting on Monday, June 29, 2015, for which evidence produced by Broussard suggests strongly that Browning was briefed, yet the matter still has not be “fixed” to this very day!

Interestingly enough, GOHSEP, according to Broussard, now says it can’t “put its hands” on documents Broussard references, but Broussard indicates on the video above that there is one person who can, “put his hands on those documents,” (See 17:34 mark of first video above) with that individual being Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry.

It was Landry who just so happened to have served as Broussard’s attorney in attempting to obtain the funds that Landry too emphatically asserted that Broussard was owed.  Most folk will recall 14th JDC Judge David Ritchie admonishing Broussard to do as the commercial says next time and, “Choose your lawyer carefully.”  Of course, it wasn’t all that long thereafter that Landry’s co-counsel, Robin Sylvester, admitted that she was withdrawing from the case largely as a result of “crooked judges” at 14th JDC.

Given that Gov. Landry was Broussard’s lead attorney and given what Judge Ritchie thought of Landry’s legal skills, we can only ponder what Gov. Landry may think of the clear discrepancy Broussard points out between what he expected of Hodges’ representations that an “independent and objective investigation” would take place, albeit it at the urging of Sen. Blake Miguez, vs. what Broussard contends was a half-hearted effort in which Bosworth and Friedmann used Broussard as a scapegoat for doing any level of review and/or investigation by, per Broussard, strongly insinuating that he had fabricated documents which he obtained from GOHSEP via his own public records requests.

 

As EBRP Mayor-President Edwards endures narrow defeat on Thrive vote, EMS Paramedic Association President Willard alerts him that 34 EMS staffers (19% of total) will resign if his EMS/BR Fire combo becomes reality.

Pie chart depicting recent vote of EBRP Paramedics and their responses of whether they support EBRP Mayor-President Sid Edwards’ proposal to merge (though EMS folk consider it an outright “takeover”) EBRP EMS with (by) BR Fire.

The same recent poll asking respondents their planned course of action if Mayor-President Edwards proposed merger (“takeover”) becomes reality.

 

EBRP Mayor-President Sid Edwards’ “Thrive Plan” yesterday was narrowly rejected by voters.  Complete but unofficial results are available by clicking here (click on “parish,” then choose EBRP from the drop-down menu).  Let us summarize the vote below:

Proposition 1 (Library renewal & $50M one-time transfer):  Yes, 25,970, or 47.2%; No, 29,046, or 52.8%.

Proposition 2 (Mosquito Abatement renewal & $6M one-time transfer):  Yes, 26,349, or 47.9%; No, 28,628, or 52.1%.

Proposition 3 (Council on Aging renewal & authorize 0.25 Mills to be redirected to the General Fund):  Yes, 25,886, or 48.9%; No, 28,146, or 51.1%.

We could spend time dissecting the Thrive vote (and likely will on a future feature), but we’re moving forward with our eight (8th) feature focusing on EBRP EMS.  Here is the third appearance of EBRP EMS Paramedic Association President Janice Willard and Vice President Allison Sharp and their admonitions to Edwards on his controversial proposal to merge (they say “takeover”) EMS with (by) the BR Fire Department:

11/4/25:  Willard and Sharp continue to provide their sentiments on Mayor-President Sid Edwards’ proposed merger (“takeover”) of EMS with (by) the BR Fire Department.

While Willard did the vast majority of the talking in the above video, in our opinion, it was Sharp who made the most astounding observation.  Specifically, Sharp referenced this feature of the Fort Worth Fire Department’s July 1, 2025 merger with the Fort Worth EMS.

As outlined in the article, Fort Worth Fire Chief Jim Davis resigned soon before allegedly facing a “no confidence vote” by the Firefighter Union in Fort Worth.

According to Willard and Sharp, Baton Rouge’s top brass governmental officials have touted the Fort Worth model as the one Baton Rouge should attempt to emulate and replicate.

Further, they assert that the resignation of the Fort Worth Fire Chief so soon after the two entities merged should serve notice upon those Baton Rouge leaders  who are pushing this merger (takeover) so hard.

As supported by surveys outlined as the lead photos of this feature, Willard and Sharp assert that, notwithstanding Edwards’ claims that “three out every four people I talk to support this measure,” his claims are in direct contradiction to the clearly-expressed desires of the “vast majority” of EMS workers, whom they assert via their surveys actually overwhelmingly oppose the planned combination.

Also, on the video above, both Willard and Sharp reference Edwards appearing on a podcast and allegedly (we use that word only because we did not listen to the podcast), stating, “I could do this tomorrow if I wanted to do that.”

While we did not listen to Edwards’ brash statement, what we did listen to is a one-hour feature of the attorney representing EMS in its litigation against the City of Baton Rouge, Robert Aguiluz, and here’s the word from the horse’s mouth entailing why he didn’t pursue a Preliminary Injunction on the present matter after the Temporary Restraining Order expired by operation of law:

No preliminary injunction was filed because the attorney representing the City represented to the Court that it would be at least 6 months, if not a year, before anything could be done regarding the Fire Department proposed takeover, so the pre-trial scheduling order was set within that time frame. The parties did agree to a schedule that was within a time frame that was less than what was represented as when the soonest was that anything could be done, and the decision not to file a preliminary injunction, as represented to the judge, was based on that represented time frame.

Aguiluz also went on to say in that same audio podcast that he does not believe the matter will ever go to trial because he plans to file a Motion for Summary Judgment for the Declaratory Order to be issued by the Court which he fully expects will be granted.  Aguiluz asserts that Edwards’ plan is, “illegal on its face because it blatantly violates the Parish Plan of Government.”  Aguiluz further states that, to resolve the problem of Edwards’ alleged illegality associated with his plan, there is  no question that his proposal would have to go before a vote of the people.

It’s worth noting that Edwards attempted to implement the core components of his Thrive initiative (most specifically a raiding of the dedicated millage going toward libraries in EBRP) without a vote of the people, but he got informed that was not possible, hence yesterday’s vote of the people.

If a hearing for a Rule to Show Cause is served upon the City after any such Motion for Summary Judgment is filed by Aguiluz, we’ll certainly be there to observe the court hearing and report upon it.

Who knows?  Perhaps Aguiluz may be more successful with this quest for a Declaratory Judgment than he was in this effort 7-1/2 years ago to have OIG Inspector General Stephen Street’s offices’ law enforcement status declared “unconstitutional.”

Now, as we wrap up this feature, we do want to point out several points that Baton Rouge Firefighter Union President Jake Morgan conveyed to us upon watching Willard and Sharp’s Second Installment in this series.  Here are the verbatim sentiments which Morgan provided to us in writing:

Robert, a few points of clarity you can address on your next video please.

#1) I explained this to Allison Sharp, but I guess she doesn’t believe me.  I did not refer to EMS as being poor stewards of tax dollars in my video (see the video at about the 18:10 mark).  I referred to dedicated tax funds for organizations with multi-million / hundreds of millions of dollars in the bank.  Library BREC, etc.) those organizations are considered to be “Gold Standard” in our parish and are very well funded.  Even after being the fantastic services that they are, they still have tremendous bank accounts.  I believe they are overtaxing the public.  EMS is not overtaxing the public, and they were not the point of my comment.

#2) Janice referred to me as “not being on the floor” (meaning I am not a fireman riding a fire truck).  That is a lie.  I am a Fire Equipment operator and work of C-Shift (meaning I drive the fire truck and work 24hr shifts at fire stations).

#3) Almost every concern they had has been addressed (in writing).  Janice was in the meetings with us and was provided documentation on these concerns.  Everybody in these meetings had ample time to speak and questions were answered at length.  Janice chose to be very silent in our meetings.

#4) if EMS employees do not want the merge to happen, fine.  We hope everything works out for them.

Finally, just like we presented Morgan’s sentiments above, we feel we have an obligation to provide EMS Reform’s Walter Beach’s commentary sent to us in writing as well regarding the videos of both Morgan and the duo of Willard and Sharp.

Perhaps not surprisingly, Beach praised the presentations of Willard and Sharp, but he referenced Morgan’s video as “propaganda.”

Finally, let us present our comprehensive table of all of the EMS features which we have published to date and provide the assurance that we will remain on top of this subject as it progresses through the court system as well as any developments thereafter on the chance that Aguiluz may be wrong in his assessment that Edwards’ plan is, “illegal on its face.”:

Date of FeatureFeature
August 7, 2025.EMS Reform's Beach slams Mayor Edwards' plan to combine EMS with Baton Rouge Fire
September 20, 2025.Beach does follow-up feature asking why there's no investment in EMS.
October 3, 2025.BR Firefighter Union President Jacob "Jake" Morgan counters points made by Beach.
October 16, 2025.EMS's Willard, Sharp counter points made by Morgan.
October 19, 2025.Kendra Bazile outlines potential EMS shortcomings entailing her son's single-vehicle crash and responses thereof.
October 24, 2025.Bazile presents evidence that her son cried "help me" after fatal crash but call classified as a "hang up."
November 10, 2025.EMS Association President Willard reveals that 77 percent of EMS folk oppose Edwards' planned merger ("takeover").
November 16, 2025.Willard reveals that 34 EMS staffers would immediately quit if Edwards' proposed merger of EMS and BR Fire were to become reality.
December 9, 2025.Bazile seeks answers entailing absence of body cam videos
January 12, 2026.Bazile asserts EBRP Attorney cancels meeting rather than permit recording of same.

 

Baton Rouge Paramedic Association’s President Willard says 77 percent of EMS employees oppose combination with BR Fire Department while only 6 percent support.

Baton Rouge Paramedic Association President Janice Willard (right) and Vice President Allison Sharp (left).

Today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature represents our seventh (7th) feature entailing East Baton Rouge Parish (EBRP) Mayor-President Sid Edwards’ controversial proposal to combine EBRP EMS with the Baton Rouge Fire Department or spinoffs thereof.

We’re using the word “combine” rather than “merge” because EMS folk and their attorney, Robert Aguiluz, himself a former paramedic, strongly object to calling the combination a “merger” and instead adamantly argue that what Edwards is proposing is an outright “takeover” of EMS, which Aguiluz has argued via litigation against the city is illegal.

Specifically, we are presenting segment two of a couple of young ladies who have agreed to appear on Sound Off Louisiana and counter arguments which have been advanced by others in other Sound Off Louisiana features.  Our guests for today’s segment of this series are once again Baton Rouge EMS Paramedic Association President Janice Willard and Vice President Allison Sharp:

Willard & Sharp provide their takes on Mayor-President Sid Edwards’ proposal for the Baton Rouge Fire Department to “take over” EBRP EMS and rebuff points made by others entailing same.

Here’s a table of all prior EMS features, and we plan to simply continue adding to the table as more individual features are published on this hot topic!

Date of FeatureFeature
August 7, 2025.EMS Reform's Beach slams Mayor Edwards' plan to combine EMS with Baton Rouge Fire
September 20, 2025.Beach does follow-up feature asking why there's no investment in EMS.
October 3, 2025.BR Firefighter Union President Jacob "Jake" Morgan counters points made by Beach.
October 16, 2025.EMS's Willard, Sharp counter points made by Morgan.
October 19, 2025.Kendra Bazile outlines potential EMS shortcomings entailing her son's single-vehicle crash and responses thereof.
October 24, 2025.Bazile presents evidence that her son cried "help me" after fatal crash but call classified as a "hang up."
November 10, 2025.EMS Association President Willard reveals that 77 percent of EMS folk oppose Edwards' planned merger ("takeover").
November 16, 2025.Willard reveals that 34 EMS staffers would immediately quit if Edwards' proposed merger of EMS and BR Fire were to become reality.
December 9, 2025.Bazile seeks answers entailing absence of body cam videos
January 12, 2026.Bazile asserts EBRP Attorney cancels meeting rather than permit recording of same.

As clearly referenced near the end of the feature, we’re looking forward to publishing segment three (3) with these two young ladies from EMS, and we thank both of them for their insightful and informative presentation as exhibited in the above video.