After Tammie Fontayne’s Cosmetology Board Hearing of August devolves to “near chaos,” she hopes to get final resolution at the November meeting.

Cosmetologist and salon owner Tammie Fontayne voices her concerns about operations of the Louisiana State Board of Cosmetology (LSBC) during an administrative hearing entailing her on August 4, 2025.  Note:  We apologize for the poor camera angle, but it was the best we were able to get, which is a huge reason we strongly support LSBC Member Rene Bosworth’s push to get these meetings moved to a more accommodating venue.

At the August 4, 2025 meeting of the LSBC, an administrative hearing entailing Tammie Fontayne became so loose that, after the hearing was over but before the LSBC rendered its ruling, Sound Off Louisiana founder Robert Burns felt compelled to inform the Board that he’d observed a ton of administrative hearings, and he’d, “never observed anything like this.”  The bottom line is that there was a ton of finger pointing of blame going back and forth and, because there simply weren’t adequate steps taken to keep what is supposed to be a formal proceeding from going severely off the rails, the display became very unprofessional before it was over.

In an unusual move, the LSBC, back on August 4, 2025, opted to take the entire matter “under advisement” (largely because of all the back-and-forth finger pointing of blame just mentioned).  The goal was to get the matter resolved today (Monday, October 6, 2025) at the Board’s meeting.

Unfortunately, due to absences of several Board Members, together with one Board Member replacing a previous Board Member (Jean Pitre replacing Brittani Pitre), and the fact the former would need to recuse himself for today’s meeting (because he didn’t hear the matter on August 4, 2025), the matter again had to be deferred to the November meeting.  The reason for that deferral was because the combination of absent Board Members and Pitre’s need to recuse himself for today meant that the Board lacked a quorum of five (5) Members to consider that matter.  In fact, because two other Members needed to depart prior to the scheduled adjournment of today’s meeting, a number of agenda items for today had to be postponed as well to November.

We felt sincere empathy for the court reporter who is now tasked with producing a transcript of that August 4, 2025 hearing for Pitre to review, and, since she said it would take “at least two weeks” for her to produce such a transcript, Burns decided to volunteer to upload a video of that August 4, 2025 administrative hearing, and here it is:

August 4, 2025:  Administrative hearing (such that it was) on Tammie Fontayne.

Since we provide the video above, let us also provide today’s (Monday, October 6, 2025)’s video pertaining to Fontayne:

October 6, 2025:  Continuation of hearing entailing Tammie Fontayne.

Finally, just as a courtesy for those who may wish to view recent LSBC meetings in their entireties, here are links for the most recent three meetings of the Board:

August 4, 2025 Meeting

September 8, 2025 Meeting

October 6, 2025 Meeting

Finally, we have committed to publishing the LSBC’s financial statements on a regular basis.  We’re doing so because, being blunt, it’s our firm contention that testimony provided by LSBC officials entailing the financial position of the LSBC before the Senate Commerce Committee during this past Legislative Session was materially and most definitely factually inaccurate.

That fact (because it is a fact) constituted the rationale for why Burns called upon those same LSBC officials to have a CPA appear before the Senate Commerce Committee and refute the testimony of Burns (an inactive CPA) regarding his testimony on the LSBC’s financial condition, which directly contradicted the testimony of LSBC officials.  Those LSBC officials never did so notwithstanding one LSBC individual in particular whose head went sideways during much of Burns’ testimony on the financial condition of the LSBC!

The LSBC’s Executive Assistant, Tisha Butler, was kind enough to email us financial statements, and we are providing this link for anyone to review those financial statements.

In short, the Board has recognized a profit of $21,000 in July of 2025 and a profit of $40,000 in August of 2025.  Furthermore, the balance sheet as of September 25, 2025 reflects an unrestricted cash balance (and we want to emphasize that word “unrestricted”) of $1,275,000.  So long as Burns has breath to continue living on this Earth, he is bound and determined to ensure that the kind of false, irresponsible testimonial statements made to elected officials regarding the LSBC’s financial condition are never allowed to transpire again!

We express appreciation to Ms. Butler for the convenience and courtesy she extended to us in offering to merely email us the financial statements rather than us having to go to the LSBC office and scan those same statements.

BR Firefighter Union President Jacob Morgan: “Walter Beach’s statement about sending fire trucks on EMS calls not doing anything is insulting to firemen across this Country….It’s just ignorant.”

Baton Rouge Firefighter Union (Local 557) President Jacob Morgan.

Our site visitors will recall our August 7, 2025 feature entailing EMS Reform’s Walter Beach and his opposition to EBRP Mayor-President Sid Edwards’ proposal to merge EBRP EMS with the BR Fire Department.  Beach also appeared on September 20, 2025 for a follow-up feature.

Near the end of both of the above-linked features, we invited anyone else who may desire to express sentiments on the proposal to reach out to us to be featured on Sound Off Louisiana.  Earlier this week, we were contacted by Baton Rouge Firefighter Union (Local 557) President Jacob Morgan who expressed a desire to be featured with a goal of providing factual information about the proposed merger while maintaining a neutral stand on the issue.  He let us know beforehand that many of the facts that he would provide would directly contradict statements made by Beach on the above two linked features.

Earlier today (Friday, October 3, 2025) we were pleased to host Mr. Morgan, and here’s video coverage of his presentation:

October 3, 2025:  Morgan provides facts entailing Mayor-President Sid Edwards’ proposal to merge the BR Fire Department with the EBRP EMS Department and counters many of the points made previously by EMS Reform’s Walter Beach.

We hope everyone found Mr. Morgan’s insights very useful and informative.

Finally, just as we’ve done for the three (3) features we’ve published for this proposed merger, if there is anyone else who would like to be a Sound Off Louisiana guest and speak on the matter, simply reach out to us as Mr. Beach and Mr. Morgan have done, and we’ll be happy to set it up.

We support NIL payments to college athletes, but we’re creatively circumventing Gov. Landry’s athlete payment online sports betting tax estimated to raise $34 million for that purpose.

Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry (photo courtesy of The Advocate).

In today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature, founder Robert Burns addresses the payments now being made to college athletes with a focus on a little-covered bill in the Louisiana Legislature this past session to provide an additional $34 million in such payments via Gov. Landry’s proposal to hike the tax on online sports wagering in Louisiana:

9/23/25:  Burns elaborates on the framework under which college athletes are now paid and provides his strategy for circumventing HB-639, a boost on the tax on online sports betting which is estimated to generate $34 million to facilitate such payments.  Note that Burns inadvertently referenced the drive thru order taker at Raising Cane’s as “Peyton” Manning when that should have been “Cooper” Manning!  [Note:  We apologize for the intermittent blurring that transpires on the above video].

Source material and props utilized in the above video:

  1. Former LSU wide receiver Abram Booty’s efforts to produce movie “work horses” to focus on alleged exploitation of college athletes.
  2. Fox Sports’ ranking of top NIL college football players’ earnings.
  3. Hilarious Raising Cane’s commercial with Arch Manning, Archie Manning, Cooper Manning (Arch Manning’s dad), Garret Nussmeier (whose father, Doug, is an assistant coach with the Saints), and Raising Canes founder Todd Graves.
  4. Advocate article entailing the onset of universities being able to DIRECTLY pay college athletes with a cap of $20.5 million per school.

From the above Advocate article:

That night marked a monumental shift in college sports. Under the settlement, Division I schools now can pay players for the first time starting July 1. Similar to other major programs, LSU plans to pay its athletes the maximum $20.5 million during the upcoming school year

As a result, LSU officials projected a usually profitable athletic department to have an $8 million deficit during the upcoming fiscal year. Zinn said LSU “will work aggressively to mitigate that” and could balance its budget by the 2027 fiscal year.

……..how third-party NIL could let them exceed the cap, their search for more money and why they feel confident in the future.

The cap will increase annually by 4% and be reevaluated every three years. LSU plans to meet the cap as it rises throughout the 10-year settlement.

5.  HB-639 in 2025 Regular Legislative Session.

6.  Original Fiscal Note for HB-639.

7.  Final Enrolled Fiscal Note on HB-639.

We placed the estimated fiscal impacts within the text during segments of the above video, but let us produce a table which succinctly summarizes those impacts:

Estimated Tax Generated and Estimated Cash Flow Into (Out of) Individual FundOriginal Bill as Drafted (increase tax from 15% to 33%).Amended Bill as Approved by Legislature and Singed into Law by Gov. Landry (increase tax from 15% to 21.5%).
Total Estimated Taxes to be Generated$68 Million.$28 Million.
Cash Flowing Into Statutory Dedication SPORT (Supporting Programs, Opportunities, Resources, and Teams) Fund.$53 Million.$34 Million.
Cash Flowing Into (Out of) Louisiana's General Fund.$15 Million.($6 Million).

8.  Link for approval of Coushatta compact eliminating tax on bets at its Indian Casino.

9.  Highlights of the January 2024 Amendment of the Coushatta Compact eliminating the tax on its gaming activities:

10.  Burns draining Draft Kings online sporting account of all but $300 when bill passage became obvious:

11.  Coushatta Casino Sports Bet (ZERO tax):

12.  Draft Kings bet placed at Queen Casino (HB-639 impacts ONLINE sports bets only and NOT bets placed at brick-and-mortar facilities for which the sports betting tax remains at 10 percent!!).

13.  Online Draft Kings bet when boosts and incentives (e.g. “no sweat bet” or “profit boost”) are offered.  For those bets, which are typically limited to $5 or $10, Burns will continue to make online (hence leaving $300 in the online account) because:  #1) they tilt the odds in the bettor’s favor, and #2) they are miniscule compared to the larger bets Burns used to make online prior to the passage of HB-639 and Gov. Landry signing the measure into law.

So, that’s it in a nutshell regarding our stance on HB-639.  Perhaps others think the measure is fantastic, and maybe a few folk seeing this feature may haul off and open online sports betting accounts to help keep college athletics programs competitive with others across the country.  That’s the chief argument advanced by proponents of the measure.

Nevertheless, as Burns states on the video, that sentiment is not the feedback he’s gotten from a number of former online sports bettors who have literally walked away from sports betting altogether after the passage of HB-639.

It’s important to note that those fiscal notes linked above hinge on online sports betting remaining constant.  We guess those forecasts would go up in smoke if many folk do like Burns is doing or others he has spoken with about the measure.  In our opinion, the existing program was working just fine, but Gov. Landry opted to try to fix something that clearly was not even remotely broken by pushing HB-639 as strongly as he did!  The result, at least for us, will be a dramatic decline in the sports wagering taxes we generate for Louisiana, and we’ve illustrated above and stated on the video how we intend to accomplish that goal.

Now, if Landry opts to get “cute” and advance another measure to further tax brick-and-mortar bets to fund SPORT, it’s not something we want to do, but make no mistake, we will join others who have totally walked away from making sports bets at all in light of the passage of HB-639!