After Sound Off Louisiana poses simple question of Gov. Edwards’ stand on reparations for slavery, two national publications follow supplying evidence of his family’s extensive past slave ownership to include “spacious family homes” built entirely by uncompensated slave labor.

 


Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards

On Monday, September 23, 2019, Sound Off Louisiana’s Robert Burns, upon reflection of national news features on reparations for past slavery, asked each of the three candidates for Governor appearing before the Baton Rouge Press Club for their thoughts on the matter.  The following video captures their responses:


Burns poses the question regarding reparations for past slavery and Gov. Edwards, Mr. Rispone, and Congressman Ralph Abraham provide their responses.

As is obvious, Gov. Edwards, who responded first, stated that reparations is, “not something I have studied or am considering.”  Three days later, the Washington Times found Gov. Edwards’ response noteworthy as it published a feature and made more than a few interesting observations, to wit:

In the case of Mr. Edwards, slave labor appears to have been instrumental in the family’s rise to affluence. Records show that spacious family homes, such as Edwards Manor near Wilmer, were built by slaves who used timber they cut and hued from the family’s extensive land holdings.

Conveyance records in the St. Tammany Parish Courthouse show Daniel Edwards, a friend of Andrew Jackson’s and the family patriarch who first held elected office in Louisiana, buying and selling slaves.

The governor’s great-great-grandfather, Nicholas Stone Edwards, then became a member of the exclusive “planter” class, which historians generally describe as people who owned more than 20 slaves.

Census records show Nicholas Stone Edwards expanded the family’s slave ownership. In 1830, he owned 35 slaves. By 1860, on the eve of the Civil War — in which he fought on the Confederate side leading what was known as the “Edwards Guards” — the family’s slave holdings had swelled to 57 people.

Now, let’s take just a moment to reflect upon the next words uttered by Gov. Edwards:  “I am focused on making sure we have access to increased opportunity and prosperity.”  We seriously doubt that Dr. Oscar “Omar” Dantzler, a black opponent of Gov. Edwards, would agree with that assessment, to wit:


Dr. Dantzler, in an interview with Sound Off Louisiana on Monday, September 16, 2019 states his resolute believe that “one of the candidates” (Edwards?) has, “paid highly money to make sure that I be concealed from the public,” entailing his candidacy for Governor of Louisiana.

If Dr. Dantzler’s statement is true, that’s a very interesting way to “increase access to increased opportunity and prosperity.”

Now, let’s consider another case where Gov. Edwards’ actions directly defy his words of “increasing opportunity and prosperity.”  On April 20, 2016, Gov. Edwards named Rev. Freddie Lee Phillips, Louisiana’s first and, to date, only African American auctioneer in its history as a member of the Louisiana Auctioneer Licensing Board (LALB).  Fifteen (15) days later, on May 5, 2016, Edwards rescinded the appointment and, on May 9, 2016, Phillips directly confronted Edwards over the move.  Let’s take a look at Phillips’ confrontation and Edwards’ stated rationale for why he removed Phillips before Phillips could even serve at his first meeting after the appointment:


Phillips confronts Edwards on his decision to remove him from the LALB only 15 days after making his appointment.

Now, as is obvious on the video, Edwards described Phillips’ appointment as “a mistake,” because he’d made a “prior commitment.”  That statement by Edwards is a 100 percent, T-total, unadulterated falsehood!  How do we know?  Because, after this bizarre incident transpired, we made extensive public records requests for all emails received by a few State Senators whom we were informed were being lobbied hard to deny Phillips’ confirmation.  We welcome our subscribers to view the flood of emails received calling for Phillips’ head and decide the validity of Edwards’ official rationale above.

Actually, we would contend that Edwards’ “mistake” was the person he chose to replace Phillips.  That would be none other than Jacob Brown, son of convicted felon Cecil Brown, who served time in Federal prison pertaining the Edwin Washington Edwards’ term as Governor from 1992 – 1996 (for which Edwards also served time in Federal prison).  Brown wasted little time fleecing Louisiana taxpayers out of over $175,000 entailing auction contracts the Edwards administration awarded Brown.  Brown was in dire need of the money to support an out-of-control drug habit!

It’s a fair question to ask at this point regarding whether Edwards has differing treatments for his appointees depending upon the color of their skin.  We would submit that he does and, further, that Caucasian appointees are treated vastly more favorably.  What prompts us to make such a claim?

Well, as everyone knows, Edwards, despite Johnny Anderson’s past reputation of extensive sexual harassment at Southern University, appointed him to his administration.  Then, when Anderson reverted to “old ways,” right under Edwards’ nose, Edwards did the right thing and fired Anderson within mere hours (taxpayers ultimately had to pay $85,000 to settle a sexual harassment suit against Anderson).  In doing so, Edwards did exactly what he should do (though we submit Anderson never should have been hired in the first place).  For the record, Anderson is African American.

Let’s contrast that with a Caucasian staffer of Edwards at the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries (LDWF):  Stephen Holliday.  Mr. Holliday was convicted for domestic abuse for punching his 14-year-old daughter in the face with a closed fist.  Edwards’ then-head of LDWF and former U. S. Congressman, Charlie Melancon, also did the right thing and demanded Holliday’s immediate resignation when evidence of the abuse conviction was uncovered.  Holliday did not want to resign but ultimately did and then immediately went to Edwards telling him just what all had transpired.  Edwards response?  Melancon was quickly escorted out on stage left, after which Edwards opted to bow to the attorney cabal who placed Edwards in office via some $6 million in PAC campaign contributions and REHIRE Holliday.

Now, yesterday, we noticed that Brietbart did a second national feature on the Edwards family’s past slave ownership.  They too had some interesting observations, to wit:

Breitbart News has confirmed the basics of the Edwards family history outlined in the Times article, though it appears the slave holdings of Gov. Edwards’ ancestors were more extensive than initially reported.

The 1850 U.S. Federal Census – Slave Schedule shows that Edwards’ great-great-great grandfather Daniel Edwards, a resident of St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, owned 26 slaves. That same census showed that Daniel Edwards’ son, Gov. Edwards’ great-great grandfather Nicholas Stone Edwards, a resident of  nearby Washington Parish, Louisiana, owned 33 slaves. Daniel Edwards and his son Nicholas Stone Edwards owned a combined 59 slaves in 1850.


The 1860 U.S. Federal Census – Slave Schedules shows that Edwards’ great-great-great grandfather Daniel Edwards, a resident of St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana, owned 57 slaves. That same census showed that Daniel Edwards’ son, Gov. Edwards’ great-great grandfather Nicholas Stone Edwards, a resident of  nearby Ward 1 in Washington Parish, Louisiana, owned 33 slaves. Daniel Edwards and his son Nicholas Stone Edwards owned a combined 90 slaves in 1860.


The Edwards family was one of the largest slave holding families in Louisiana in 1860, and was near the top one percent of slave holding families in the entire country at that time, according to data provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, 1970.

In 1860, there were about 22,000 slave holders in Louisiana. Only 547 owned more than 100 slaves. There were about 390,000 slave holders in the country, of which about 2,300 owned more than 100 slaves.

In 1869, during the Reconstruction period,  a new parish, Tangipahoa Parish was organized from parts of St. Tammany Parish, where Gov. Edwards’ great-great-great grandfather Daniel Edwards lived at the time,  and Washington Parish, where the governor’s great-great grandfather Nicholas Stone Edwards lived.

The Edwards family has played a prominent role in the politics of Tangipahoa Parish ever since.

Perhaps Gov. Edwards has never “studied reparations” and is not “pursuing it” because of the sheer size of the checks he may have to write to some of his African American neighbors in and around the Amite, Louisiana area who are descendants of slaves who helped his family amass its vast wealth.  Just a thought!  At any rate, it’s interesting how one relatively simple question at a forum can blossom, huh?

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future posts, simply go to our home page and scroll to the bottom (mobile devices) or to the top of the right-hand column (desktops).  Supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above.

Cleo Fields, candidate for Louisiana Senate District 14: “There are some things in Louisiana that we ought not have to have a license to do.” Volunteers to sponsor bill to eliminate license requirement for hair braiders.

Former Congressman and former State Sen. Cleo Fields, who is a current candidate for Louisiana Senate District 14.

State Rep. Patricia Smith, who is a candidate for Louisiana Senate District 14.

Today’s meeting of the Baton Rouge Press Club was a forum of the two candidates for Louisiana Senate District 14:  Former U. S. Congressman (and former State Senator) Cleo Fields and State Rep. Patricia Smith.

Sound Off Louisiana‘s Robert Burns asked both candidates where they stand on the issue of removing licensing requirements for hair braiders.  Smith was also asked to justify her opposition to a bill by State Rep. Julie Emerson (R-Carencro) to do just that.  Let’s take a look at their responses:


Burns poses the question regarding support for a bill to exempt hair braiding from requiring a license and Fields’ response.

Now let’s take a look at Smith’s response together with her rationale for opposing Emerson’s bill:


Smith responds to the hair braiding question to include her rationale for her opposition.

Smith’s response is an absolute insult to our knowledge of behind-the-scenes negotiating that goes on at the Legislature.  Smith’s opposition (and that of many other members of the Legislative Black Caucus), contrary to her statement above that the opposition was based on “a lack of communication with the Cosmetology Board” (which is itself not a justification), is complete and utter horse manure!

We can state with unequivocal certainty that Smith’s opposition (and that of many other black state representatives) was based on a perception that Rep. Emerson would not be supportive of an increase in the minimum wage in Louisiana.

A bill to do that had just been stymied in a House Committee, and anger among black legislators spewed over, and Emerson happened to be the first legislator available upon whom to vent their frustration.

So, in other words, Smith and other black legislators were perfectly willing to suppress economic opportunities for their constituencies as a result of their dogmatic belief (despite university economists who teach that an arbitrary increase in the minimum wage increases unemployment among those earning that wage) that Louisiana’s minimum wage simply must be increased, end of story!  Wow!  That’s one hell of a way to represent a constituency!

It’s just that sort of twisted “logic” (and we’re being kind in our level of sarcasm) that necessitates entities like the Institute for Justice to end up being forced to sue the Cosmetology Board, while Smith seems to insist this Board has to be coddled and cajoled!

It is also abundantly clear from Smith’s answer that she is 100% clueless to the rampant corruption on the Cosmetology Board and that fact is almost unfathomable given the 12 years she has served in the Louisiana Legislature during which she should have become better educated regarding that Board’s corruption!

Based upon the sharply-contrasting responses to the question posed above and given that occupational licensing reform is the single most important issue to us at Sound Off Louisiana, it’s obvious that our choice for the next Senator from District 14 is Cleo Fields!

Burns posed one other question entailing rolling back the massive increase in sales taxes renewed in 2018 which have now resulted in a $500 million surplus.  Here are the candidates’ responses:


Fields and Smith provide their thoughts on rolling back sales tax increases in light of Louisiana’s $500 million budget surplus.

  

CLICK HERE for the forum in its entirety, which includes more than a little animus between the two candidates and Fields repeatedly stating that District 14 has been “without a State Senator” for 12 years.

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future posts, simply go to our home page and scroll to the bottom (mobile devices) or to the top of the right-hand column (desktops).  Supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above.

Sound Off Louisiana issues full set of endorsements for state-wide and legislative races.

U. S. Congressman Ralph Abraham, who is the top-of-ticket endorsement of Sound Off Louisiana for the 2019 election cycle.

 

Statewide Race Endorsements:

 

After careful review, Sound Off Louisiana makes the following endorsements (highlighted in red), which are also easily viewable by clicking here.  Note:  If you do not know your House or Senate District, CLICK HERE.

 

Governor:

Ralph Abraham (REP)
Oscar “Omar” Dantzler (DEM)
John Bel Edwards (DEM)
Gary Landrieu (IND)
Patrick “Live Wire” Landry (REP)
“Eddie” Rispone (REP)

 

The negative attack ads by Rispone against Abraham (after committing on numerous occasions not to engage in such activity) have rendered Rispone unelectable in a runoff against Edwards in our opinion.  While we would certainly support Rispone in a runoff, the same cannot be said by many North Louisiana Republicans who have a strong affinity for Abraham and who are justifiably deeply offended by #1) the attack ads themselves, and #2) the despicable action of duplicating Gumbo PAC ads entailing charitable contributions on the part of Congressman Abraham.  We submit that, when a well-respected, conservative Republican Resentative like Alan Seabaugh (R-Shreveport) flips from Rispone to Abraham as a direct result of the ads, and popular conservative talk show host Moon Griffon, who had been neutral, spends 23 minutes lambasting Rispone over the move, our notion is reinforced.  Essentially, we believe Rispone has placed us all in an “Abraham or bust” position.

 

Lieutenant Governor:

Willie Jones (DEM)
William “Billy” Nungesser (REP)

 

Nunguesser cautions against overconfidence, but he should win this one by a pretty large margin.

 

Secretary of State:

Kyle Ardoin (REP)
“Gwen” Collins-Greenup (DEM)
Thomas J. Kennedy III (REP)
Amanda “Jennings” Smith (REP)

 

The power of incumbency and experience should cause Ardoin to cruise in this one.

 

Attorney General:

“Ike” Jackson, Jr. (DEM)
“Jeff” Landry (REP)

 

While we would have preferred Landry pursue additional corruption (some of which we submitted to his office), he certainly battled Edwards’ attempts to cram convicted felon Larry Bankston down voters’ throats, and he consistently challenged Edwards’ executive orders in court and prevailed.

 

Treasurer:

Derrick Edwards (DEM)
Teresa Kenny (NOPTY)
John M. Schroder (REP)

Schroder has been instrumental in efforts to reform the capital outlay budgeting process, which he has never been bashful about referencing as “corrupt and constituting blackmail.”

Commissioner of Agriculture:

Marguerite Green (DEM)
“Charlie” Greer (DEM)
Michael G. “Mike” Strain (REP)
Peter Williams (DEM)
Bradley Zaunbrecher (REP)

 

Yes, Greer is a Democrat.  He has also effectively made the case on Moon Griffon’s show that Strain has been nonresponsive to farmers who have repeatedly sought his office’s assistance.  While Strain may have no time for farmers, he clearly has plenty of time to cater to florists.  Strain heavily fought a bill to eliminate the need to have a license to be a florist.  For that reason, Strain is a non-starter for us!  It’s that simple!  Regarding Zaunbrecher, he readily admits that he has no intention of winning this race and is merely attempting to establish name recognition for a 2023 run.

 

Commissioner of Insurance:

James J. “Jim” Donelon (REP)
“Tim” Temple (REP)

Both candidates have severe drawbacks; however, for Temple to slam previous Commissioners while simultaneously utilizing one of them (Wooley) in his effort to win is absolutely beyond the pale.  It’s indicative of someone who wants to have his cake and eat it too, and that tilted the scale for us in endorsing Donelon.

 

Constitutional Amendments:

ONE:

Do you support an amendment to exempt raw materials, goods, commodities, personal property, and other articles stored in public and private warehouses and destined for the Outer Continental Shelf from ad valorem taxes? (December 1, 2019) (Amends Article VII, Section 21(D)(2) and (3))

 

YES.  This was an overreach by coastal parishes’ assessors that is almost certain to be challenged as a violation of the U. S. Constitution.  In our opinion, the plaintiffs will prevail in that litigation, and we taxpayers will once again be stuck with massive legal fees defending litigation which could have been avoided by voters pre-empting a court battle and exempting the items from this overly-aggressive action by coastal parish assessors.

 

TWO:

 

Do you support an amendment to provide for appropriations from the Education Excellence Fund for the Louisiana Educational Television Authority, Thrive Academy, and laboratory schools operated by public postsecondary education institutions? (Amends Article VII, Section 10.8(C)(3)(b), (c), and (g); Repeals Article VII, Section 10.8(C)(3)(d))

NO. While the legislation is purported to “correct an oversight” entailing three (3) schools (Thrive, University Lab, and Southern University Lab) and only entails $75,000/year each plus the average per pupil amount the fund pays to other public schools, these schools already have substantial MFP funding and tuition which are already aided by Louisiana State taxpayer subsidies.

 

THREE:

 

Do you support an amendment to protect taxpayers by requiring a complete remedy in law for the prompt recovery of any unconstitutional tax paid and to allow the jurisdiction of the Board of Tax Appeals to extend to matters related to the constitutionality of taxes? (Adds Article V, Section 35)

 

Not just NO, but HELL NO!  Given the rampant corruption we have seen by various boards and commissions with members appointed by the Governor, the last thing we want is yet another body of political hacks deciding the constitutionality of taxes!  We think it’s better to challenge the taxes in court and hope for an informed judge to make the ruling (which can then be appealed).  In all likelihood, taxpayers unhappy with a ruling would be challenged in the courts anyway.  This measure would thus merely add yet another layer of legal expenses incurred.  Even if the plaintiff is happy with the ruling of the Board, that happiness may likely result from connections rather than a proper interpretation of Louisiana’s Constitution.  We’ve seen way, way too much cronyism on appointed boards and commissions in Louisiana to go along with this amendment!

 

FOUR:

 

Do you support an amendment to allow the City of New Orleans to exempt property within Orleans Parish from all or part of ad valorem taxes that would otherwise be due for the purpose of promoting affordable housing? (Adds Article VII, Section 21(O))

NO. There are already too many subsidies both on the Federal and State level for “affordable housing,” and this proposal has waste and abuse stamped directly on its forehead!

 

HOUSE Endorsements:

 

DISTRICT 5 (Shreveport area):

Brian A. Salvatore (DEM)
Alan Seabaugh (REP)

 

See our commentary regarding Seabaugh’s quest to be the next Speaker of the House.

 

DISTRICT 39 (Carencro area):

Paul “Polo” Carter (DEM)
Julie Emerson (REP)

 

Emerson is a true champion for occupational licensing reform and voted “no” on every single occasion entailing the sales tax renewal of 2018!

 

DISTRICT 46 (St. Martinville area):

Keith Baudin (REP)
Virginia “Ginger” Benoit (REP)
Michael “Mike Pete” Huval (REP)

Baudin is about the only candidate (Bob Bell for Senate District 16 being the other — see below) willing to publicly state on camera that he will NOT vote for ANY tax increase.  As evidenced by the prior link, Huval has voted for many and has a disastrous voting record when it comes to occupational licensing reform.

 

DISTRICT 48 (New Iberia area):

“Beau” Beaullieu (REP)
Dana Dugas (REP)
Ricky Gonsoulin (REP)
David Levy (DEM)

 

Gonsolin has been one of the most effective interviewees we’ve listened to on the Moon Griffon show in a LONG time.  He demonstrates a genuine grasp of Louisiana’s dire need of tort reform and other important measures vital toward improving Louisiana’s languishing economy.

 

DISTRICT 51 (Houma area):

Beryl Amedee (REP)
Clayton Voisin (REP)

Amedee consistently voted against the sales tax renewals every single time in 2018.

 

DISTRICT 66 (Baton Rouge area):

“Rick” Edmonds (REP)
Morgan Lamandre (DEM)
David Smith (LBT)

 

Edmonds, along with Seabaugh and Miguez (unopposed), can be counted upon to always consistently oppose tax increases!

 

DISTRICT 71 (Denham Springs / Livingston area):

Lori Callais (DEM)
Jonathan Davis (REP)
Ivy Graham (REP)
“Buddy” Mincey, Jr. (REP)
Robert Poole (REP)

 

Davis is a young, energetic, conservative Republican whom we believe will represent his district well in the House.

 

DISTRICT 77 (Mandeville area):

Beverly Johnson (DEM)
Mark Wright (REP)

 

Wright voted “no” every single time entailing the 2018 sales tax renewals.

 

DISTRICT 95 (Albany/Springfield area):

Sherman Mack (REP)
Robin Parrott (DEM)

Mack also voted “no” every single time entailing the 2018 sales tax renewals.  While we support his re-election, we staunchly oppose his efforts to be the next Speaker of the House.

 

SENATE Endorsements:

 

DISTRICT 9 (Metairie area):

J. Cameron Henry, Jr. (REP)
Jon “Frankie” Hyers (REP)

Henry voted “no” every single time on the 2018 sales tax renewals.  He’ll be replacing conservative Senator Conrad Appel.

 

DISTRICT 10 (Kenner area):

Arita M. Lipps Bohannan (REP)
“Kirk” Talbot (REP)

 

Talbot strongly supports tort reform, and this election is key in making such reform a reality.  Talbot will be a sea change vs. the present senator to occupy that seat, Dan Martiny.

 

DISTRICT 11 (Mandeville area):

Daniel Ducote (REP)
Reid Falconer (REP)
Patrick McMath (REP)

 

Falconer consistently voted against the 2018 sales tax renewals and will be a strong conservative voice in the Louisiana Senate.

 

DISTRICT 12 (Franklington area):

Darrell Fairburn (DEM)
“Beth” Mizell (REP)

 

Mizell has been a rock-solid conservative voice in the Senate.  She should have no trouble whatsoever in her re-election efforts.

 

DISTRICT 13 (Livingston area):

Edith Carlin (REP)
Deven W. Cavalier (REP)
J. Rogers Pope (REP)

Critical race that Carlin needs to prevail in if the seat is to be solidly conservative!

 

DISTRICT 16 (Baton Rouge area):

Everett Baudean (LBT)
“Bob” Bell (REP)
Beverly Brooks Thompson (DEM)
“Steve” Carter (REP)
Franklin Foil (REP)

The fact that Bell is a huge underdog matters not to us.  He has been willing to commit on camera that he will not support any tax increase!  If the runoff ends up being Carter and Foil, we will make no endorsement thereof as both have hugely disappointing voting records from our perspective!

DISTRICT 20 (Houma area):

Brenda Leroux Babin (DEM)
Damon J. Baldone (REP)
Michael “Big Mike” Fesi (REP)
Jerry “Truck” Gisclair (DEM)
Shane Swan (REP)

Fesi is a major employer in the oil and gas service field and has created many jobs.  He’ll be a valuable member of the Senate if he prevails.

DISTRICT 25 (Jennings area):

Mark Abraham (REP)
Kevin M. Berken (REP)
John E. “Johnny” Guinn (REP)

 

This is the easiest race of all to analyze!  Berken has repeatedly stressed on Moon Griffon’s show his desire for tort reform and other business-friendly initiatives and his opposition to tax increases.  In sharp contrast, Mark “Mo taxes” Abraham has consistently voted for more taxes than we can count.  Guinn voted for so many taxes that he was inducted into American’s For Prosperity’s “Taker’s Dozen.”  As we have emphasized, he is also strongly supportive of the illegal practice of shill bidding to take from the bidding public at auctions.  Also, Guinn has quite the reputation at the State Capitol, and suffice to say it’s not a flattering one.  Is it any wonder that, in 12 years as a House member (thank God he’s term-limited out), no Speaker ever felt comfortable awarding him a committee chairmanship?

 

DISTRICT 28 (Ville Platte area):

Heather Cloud (REP)
Robert Johnson (DEM)
H. Bernard LeBas (DEM)

Attorney General Jeff Landry has called this “the most important Legislative race in this election cycle,” and we concur.  Both Johnson and LeBas would not even remotely be reflective of a fiscal conservative’s interests, and they both have voting records to demonstrate their love affair with taxation of the people they represent.

 

DISTRICT 36 (Bossier City area):

Ryan Gatti (REP)
Robert Mills (REP)
Mattie Preston (DEM)

 

Gatti may as well be John Bel Edwards’ clone and, God knows, it’s bad enough having to deal with one John Bel Edwards!  Having a second one serving in the State Senate masquerading around as a Republican is frustrating beyond words!  Mills, meanwhile, represents a fiscal conservative’s dream and has the backing of a heavy slate of powerful Republican lawmakers.

DISTRICT 38 (Shreveport area):

Katrina D. Early (DEM)
John Milkovich (DEM)
Barry Milligan (REP)

While Sen. Milkovich has been a champion of reforming occupational licensing in Louisiana, he has also blocked tort reform.  Further, he’s gotten a reputation for being hostile and combative to his colleagues oftentimes  alienating those sympathetic to his cause.  He is obviously banking on the “heartbeat bill” to get him over the bar, but Milligan would be far more inclined to get us to the promised land entailing tort reform.

 

Well, those are our recommendations, folks!  Please don’t fail to go vote on Saturday, October 12, 2019!

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future posts, simply go to our home page and scroll to the bottom (mobile devices) or to the top of the right-hand column (desktops).  Supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above.