Newly-elected LSPC Chairman Simien lashes out at audience (Leon “Bucky” Millet) about “decorum,” notwithstanding that its own members have engaged in outrageous conduct & decorum!

Newly-elected LSPC Chairman Eulis Simien, Jr.

 

At its regular meeting of Thursday, November 9, 2017, the Louisiana State Police Commission (LSPC) elected a new Chairman to replace disgraced former Chairman T. J. Doss, who resigned soon after Sound Off Louisiana’s Robert Burns videotaped him exiting a movie theater and checking into the Watermark hotel with LSPC Vice Chairman Monica Manzella (who also resigned in disgrace) within hours of the prior LSPC meeting of August 10, 2017.  In fact, it was their outlandish conduct that triggered their resignations that, in turn, caused the LSPC not to be able to convene a quorum for its September 8, 2017 and October 13, 2017 meetings.

 

That new Chairman is Eulis Simien, Jr..  Simien wasted no time implementing the apparent audience-unfriendly tone we can only assume will be the norm going forward.  He did so when Burns merely asked for a repeat by LSPC attorney Lenore Feeney of the “new” reason by which she justified the LSPC going into Executive Session.  The only thing that is known is that the agenda item dealt with “the matter of Investigation of LSTA (Louisiana State Trooper Association) Political Contributions.”  Feeney stated prior to the exit for executive session that the justification for doing so was “pending litigation.”  However, Burns challenged that reason and stated that he believed that convening an executive session for “pending litigation” when there is no “pending litigation” would likely be an “inappropriate” action by the LSPC.  Feeney nevertheless stated her resolve that the internal docket number on the agenda “would be interpreted to be ‘pending litigation’ before the LSPC.”

 

According to several audience members, prior to regular session reconvening, Feeney indicated that the reason for executive session was being “changed” to “investigative proceedings regarding allegations of misconduct.”  Because that disclosure was made rather matter-of-factly and informally before regular session could be formally reconvened, Burns asked newly-elected Chairman Simien if Feeney could restate the reason in order that it could be captured on film.  Simien flatly denied Burns’ simple request; furthermore, he did so in a rather terse and bordering on belligerent manner.

 

Additionally, Simien was far from letting his high-horse display of crassness end with his terse commentary to Burns.  He subsequently decided to place long-time LSPC critic, veteran, and retired LSP Trooper Leon “Bucky” Millet in his place about him being a stern watchdog over LSPC operations.  Though Simien’s commentary was ostensibly directed at all audience members, his eyes were laser-focused on Millet, and Millet even inquired what the parameters would be going forward in terms of agenda requests he may have.

 

First, let’s observe Millet’s public comment (he never minces his words), which may have likely gotten under Simien’s skin:

 


 

Retired LSP Trooper (and VETERAN) Leon “Bucky” Millet makes public comment at the November 9, 2017 LSPC meeting.

 

Simien addresses the public entailing “decorum” while his eyes stay laser-focused on Millet like a quarterback staring down his receiver!

 

The LSPC has itself had many outlandish exchanges between LSPC members.  Millet, who was kicked out of the LSTA for his role in calling for an investigation of the LSTA political contributions now ostensibly under investigation by the LSPC, has asked for numerous items to be placed on the LSPC agenda.  In fact, the May 11, 2017 LSPC agenda was comprised almost exclusively of items Millet requested to be discussed by the LSPC.  Obviously, the LSPC would not currently (and belatedly) even be ostensibly investigating the current LSTA contributions were it not for Millet.

 

Perhaps considerable frustration was aired toward Millet during executive session, and Simien may have been given his marching orders (most likely by controversial member Jared Caruso-Riecke) to fire a shot across the bow to Millet that he is not going to dictate the LSPC’s agenda going forward and that he should not expect the LSPC to investigate everything under the sun that he may desire or assert wrongdoing transpired.

 

Millet is the only person who ever makes public comment at LSPC meetings and, given that we’ve never observed “poor decorum” on his part entailing his public comment, we can only assume he’s being told not to expect to dominate the LSPC’s agenda content as he has occasionally done in the past.  That’s especially true given Simien’s statement that “we have a job to do, and we will maintain decorum.”

 

At any rate, given the fact Gov. Edwards doesn’t remotely have the guts to remove Caruso-Riecke from the LSPC and given the latter’s ultimate displays of decorum deficiencies at meetings such as the one linked above, calling Millet out on the carpet in using a less-than-subtle inference that Millet has failed to “maintain decorum” is nothing short of an absolute insult!

Links for Fox8’s Lee Zurik investigative series on LSP payroll fraud:  Installment:

one, two, three fourfive,  and six.

For a 10-segment breakdown of the November 9, 2017 LSPC meeting, CLICK HERE.

 

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future Sound Off posts, simply scroll to the very bottom of this page (mobile devices) or to the end of the right-hand column (desktops) and supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above. 

LSPC, after controversial executive session, votes to re-open investigation of LSTA campaign contributions to Gov. Edwards, others.

Newly-Elected LSPC Chairman Eulis Simien, Jr.

 

Literally days after Governor John Bel Edwards was sworn into office, a group of retired troopers asked the Louisiana State Police Commission (LSPC) to investigate campaign contributions made by the Louisiana State Trooper’s Association (LSTA) into Gov. Edwards’ 2015 campaign for Governor.  They asserted that a “straw donor,” David Young, LSTA’s Executive Director, made the contributions, which totaled $8,000, through his personal account but was then reimbursed by the LSTA for those contributions, which constitutes a violation of law.

 

The LSPC assigned T. Taylor Townsend, the head of Gov. Edwards’ Super PAC, to conduct the investigation.  Townsend recommended that the LSPC summarily dismiss the matter in stating that the LSPC had no jurisdiction over the LSTA.  One retired trooper, Leon “Bucky” Millet, has consistently requested a written report from Townsend and has repeatedly requested that the LSPC place the item on the LSPC’s agenda.  Each time the item was discussed, the LSPC said that Townsend was declining to issue a written report, and all the LSPC had to hang its hat on was his oral statement that the matter should be dismissed.

 

Former LSPC Executive Director Cathy Derbonne has publicly stated that the LSPC strong-armed her resignation (which she granted effective January 13, 2017) as a result of her having reported the illegal campaign contributions.  The Louisiana State Board of Ethics investigated the matter and fined the LSTA $5,000 for the violations.  Former LSPC Member Lloyd Grafton, who resigned on February 9, 2017 in frustration of the treatment he asserts Derbonne received, bluntly characterized the campaign contributions, which Edwards refunded but several other political candidates, including former Gov. Bobby Jindal, did not, as “pure money laundering.”

 

Millet’s efforts appeared to possibly bear fruit on Thursday, November 9, 2017, when the LSPC, after convening a controversial executive session, shocked observers by voting to set aside Townsend’s findings and re-open an investigation into the campaign contributions.  Sound Off Louisiana’s Robert Burns openly questioned the stated justification for executive session, which was “pending litigation.”  He contended that there was no “pending litigation” and the mere presence of an internal docket number applicable only for the LSPC did not constitute pending litigation before a state judicial court.  Nevertheless, LSPC legal counsel Lenore Feeney stated her opinion that the matter would be assessed as “pending litigation” due to the matter appearing before the LSPC.

 

Feeney’s response to Burns notwithstanding, just before the regular meeting reconvened after executive session had concluded, Feeney quickly announced that as a “matter of record” the reason for the executive session was being changed to “investigative proceedings regarding allegations of misconduct.”  Burns, who had not had time to get his camera turned on to capture Feeney’s stated change, asked newly-elected Chairman Eulis Simien, Jr. (former Chairman T. J. Doss and Vice Chairman Monica Manzella resigned in disgrace after disturbing videos taken by Burns of the two exiting a movie theater and checking into the Watermark hotel were published by fellow blogger Tom Aswell that same day) if Feeney could restate the reason for the change in justification for executive session for the benefit of his camera.  Simien tersely denied the request and reacted tersely to Burns’ second request for a repeat.  Further, Simien continued his audience-unfriendly demeanor we can only assume will be maintained going forward in dressing Millet down.

 

Given all the turmoil of LSP and the LSPC, including the following Lee Zurik investigative series installments on LSP payroll fraud:  Installments  one, two, three four five, and six Simien’s terse language and subsequent condescending commentary directed at audience members, which we’ll report on separately, would seem particularly inopportunely timed.  Nevertheless, the following video captures this surprising LSPC action.

 

 

LSPC discusses “Investigation of LSTA political contributions.”

 

For a 10-segment breakdown of the November 9, 2017 LSPC meeting, CLICK HERE.

 

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future Sound Off posts, simply scroll to the very bottom of this page (mobile devices) or to the end of the right-hand column (desktops) and supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above. 

JBE appointee Jacobs-Levy “stands by every word” of damning email, emphatically refuses to recuse herself from votes on member she covertly ousted to take his seat on Auctioneer Board.


Louisiana Auctioneer Licensing Board Member Darlene Jacobs-Levy

Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards, on May 9, 2016, provided a (being kind) feeble explanation for his ouster of Rev. Freddie Lee Phillips, Louisiana’s first and only African American auctioneer in its history, only four days before from the Louisiana Auctioneer Licensing Board (LALB).  That May 9, 2016 date was also only 15 days after Edwards made the Phillips appointment.

 

Later, Phillips would learn that Darlene Jacobs-Levy covertly sought to oust him, but he simply accepted that fact and subsequently founded what is now the only in-state auction school:  The Freddie Phillips School of Auctioneering.  That school was approved by the LALB on March 6, 2017 with Ms. Jacobs-Levy having specifically asked if Rev. Phillips anticipated having online instruction at the school.  Phillips responded that he did, and no LALB member, including Jacobs-Levy, who voted in favor of licensing the school, voiced any opposition or concern.  Nevertheless, at the September 11, 2017 LALB meeting, Jacobs-Levy voted to deny the first graduate of the school, Derek Perry, his auction license.  She was the lone dissenting vote.

 

At the November 6, 2017 meeting, Phillips made known his preference for “peace and not war,” and school instructor Robert Burns, sensing Jacobs-Levy’s continued hostile sentiments toward Phillips, sought to have Jacobs-Levy recuse herself as a result of a damning email (see image below) wherein Jacobs-Levy cast Phillips in a very desparaging light.  As evidenced by the video below, Jacobs-Levy sternly rejected any notion that she recuse herself; furthermore, she went so far as to state:  “I stand by every word and allegation of that email.”:

 

Discussion entailing impending vote for John Gore, the second graduate of the  Freddie Phillips School of Auctioneering, to be licensed as a Louisiana auctioneer.  (See damning email read into the record below).
Recorded phone call between Jacobs and Burns of 5/6/16 referenced above.

Jacobs-Levy took matters further when she attempted a Hail Mary outlandish, unsubstantiated, and totally false allegation regarding instruction at the school:

Jacobs-Levy falsely accuses Phillips and/or Burns of “giving out legal advice.”

 

Jacobs-Levy makes her outlandish claim entailing the school’s illustration of a lawsuit against Gilmore Auction wherein the plaintiff makes the allegation that Frances Braud, Gilmore’s business partner and a real estate broker, “advised petitioner (buyer) that she had to wait until insurance proceeds were known.” The Plaintiff further alleged that Braud specifically said, “there was no need to get an attorney involved.”  The school teaches the exact opposite and emphasized that Braud could have and should have advised, “It may be in your best interest to seek legal counsel.”  How ironic that Jacobs-Levy would then outlandishly state that Burns and/or Phillips are “giving legal guidance” when, in reality, the guidance was to seek the services of an attorney!!

As to her statements about the “legal interpretation of the judgment,” the judgment is self-explanatory and states what it states!  Lawsuit illustrations of this nature are replete throughout the school’s online video instruction, and Jacobs-Levy, rather than assisting aspiring auctioneers to learn from others’ mistakes (lesson 17, informal title searches, demonstrates instructor Burns’ own misfortune by not engaging in an informal title search before taking on his first real estate auction client and the ensuing mess he got himself into) and thereby not repeat them, Jacobs-Levy is actively working to shut this school, together with the invaluable instruction it provides, down!

Perhaps such shoot-from-the-hip, ill-advised statements by Jacobs-Levy are to be expected given that she totally imploded in a recent “wrongful death” civil suit by making similar shoot-from-the-hip statements in court (after having 13 years to prepare for trial!!).  Despite her 13 years to prepare, Jacobs-Levy had the following horrendous performances in open court:

1.  Stating to LSP Trooper Phillip Tagliarino, after he’d responded to a question of whether he’d called for backup with “Yes, ma’am,” that, “It’s not on the video!”  She then had the embarrassment of playing the video in open court, only for the entire courtroom, including three jurors who raised their hands upon him calling for backup, readily seeing and hearing the man call for backup!  Just what does the family of Mr. Arway, who’d retained Jacobs-Levy and waited 13 years for this disastrous episode, think of their counsel upon that episode?  Likely not much.  What does the bankruptcy trustee who’d agreed to retain Jacobs-Levy to pursue the claim (and thereby expend precious resources of the bankrupt estate) think of that horrendous performance in court? It probably wasn’t that favorable would be our guess!!

2.  Asking of Trooper Tagliarino, after he’d responded to her question of why he didn’t retreat to his vehicle by stating, “because that would violate every aspect of training we’re given in these circumstances,” the following question:  “Oh, so for you, it was not an option?”  Do we really need to elaborate on the utterly asinine nature of that question?  Tagliarino was justifiably baffled as to what kind of response he should even provide.

It’s one thing for Darlene Jacobs-Levy to make a complete fool of herself in the Tagliarino trial in the manner in which she did.  No doubt Andrew Blanchfiled, LSP and Trooper Phillip Tagliarino’s defense counsel, was delighted to have her and her obvious anti-law-enforcement bias as his best weapon for winning over the jury.  If so, she was clearly effective given a 12-0 jury verdict in favor of LSP and Tagliarino in just over 90 minutes of deliberations.  It’s quite another thing to see the incredible degree to which Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards is so willing to let Jacobs-Levy embarrass him and his administration.  Nevertheless, only he can bring a stop to it and, if he is unwilling to do so, we will be more than happy to continue to expose her antics and any obvious embarassment to him and his so-called “Honor Code!”

 

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future Sound Off posts, simply scroll to the very bottom of this page (mobile devices) or to the end of the right-hand column (desktops) and supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above.