Category: Uncategorized

Louisiana Solicitor General Liz Murrill.

Dr. Oscar Dantzler vents his frustrations with the U. S. Post Office and openly expresses concerns that mail-in ballots for President Trump will not be delivered, processed, and counted.

Sound Off Louisiana subscribers will recall our September 20, 2020 feature in which Dr. Oscar Dantzler, a Democratic opponent of incumbent Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards in 2019, sued Gov. Edwards and the Tangipahoa Parish School Board for what Dantzler asserts is an organized conspiracy to deny him a promotion which became open at the School Board.

In that feature, we briefly referenced the frustration that Dantzler was having with the United States Post Office.  Sound Off Louisiana‘s founder, Robert Burns, accompanied Dantzler on Saturday, September 20, 2020 to the Downtown Baton Rouge post office and witnessed Dantzler and the manager of that postal office go toe to toe entailing Dantzler’s frustration that his package to serve Gov. Edwards with his lawsuit had been sitting at the processing plant on Bluebonnet since August 26, 2020.  At that time, 25 days had lapsed with the package just sitting in the processing plant.

The manager of the post office did not in any way deny that the package was just waiting to eventually be processed.  She indicted that the post office was “swamped” with mail that was just stacking up sky high as a result of Hurricane Laura.  When Dantzler emphasized that he had placed the package in the mail well before Laura, the manager stated that was irrelevant and that it could me “months” before he could ever expect any action on his package.  Burns witnessed her say that to him!

Dantzler stated then that he had no confidence that any mail-in ballots for President Trump would ever make their destinations and be counted, and his concerns were amplified even more on Tuesday, October 20, 2020, when Dantzler expressed even more frustration that the same package to serve Governor Edwards continues to sit idle at the Bluebonnet processing center, with it now having sat there for 56 days (as of the 10/25/20 publication of this feature).

Obviously, the manager of the Downtown Baton Rouge post office meant what she said when she bluntly told Dantzler that it could be “months” before his package may ever get processed.

Dantzler is emphatic that the stalling is intentional because postal officials know what’s in his package as he’s made no secret of it, and he contends that Gov. Edwards’ office has instructed postal officials not to deliver the lawsuit to them.  Let’s take a look at Dantzler venting his frustration and openly questioning how President Trump has any hope that mail-in ballots from neighborhoods known to be dominated by Republicans have any hope of actually making it to their destinations to be tallied for Trump’s final vote tally:

Dantzler openly expresses his concerns that Trump mail-in ballots will be delivered, processed, and counted in Trump’s tally of votes.
CLICK HERE to see the USPS’s real-time tracking of Dantzler’s package to perfect service upon Gov. John Bel Edwards.

Dantzler also felt that there is plenty else going against him regarding his litigation.  Let’s take a look at what all he had to say:

 
Dantzler vents frustrations at recent rulings in his Washington DC litigation against Edwards and the Tangipahoa Parish School Board.  CLICK HERE for the full package of court documentation which Dantzler supplied for this feature.

As outlined in the preceding video, Dantzler was not pleased that his case was transferred to Judge McFadden from Judge Lamberth.  Dantzler stated that rulings had been favorable to him under Lamberth, and so he opposed the transfer to McFadden’s courtroom.  Upon our return from filming the feature above, Dantzler texted us asking us to include the following screen shots about the two judges as part of our feature, so we’re concluding this feature by doing as he requested:

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future posts, simply go to our home page and scroll to the bottom (mobile devices) or to the top of the right-hand column (desktops).  Supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above.

LABI President Stephen Waguespack.

In today’s Sound Off Louisiana feature, founder Robert Burns examines the campaign finance reports for the three (3) candidates for an an opening on the First Circuit Court of Appeals.  Republican candidate Chris Hester’s report is troubling to Burns due to Hester’s extensive reliance upon the Louisiana trial lawyer cabal to fund his campaign.  Burns found this fact perplexing given that the Louisiana Association of Business and Industry (LABI), which fought so diligently for tort reform in the most recent Legislative Session, has openly endorsed Chris Hester.  From the preceding link:

For months, we have gathered information from the legal community and interviewed over 60 candidates, seeking out individuals who support greater efficiency and transparency in the third branch of government. We’re pleased to endorse this slate of candidates for the judiciary who embrace those ideas,” said Bo Staples, LABI PAC Director. “Our regional PACs have met for weeks, getting to know these candidates, their backgrounds, motivations and gain a feel for their judicial temperament, and were extremely encouraged by what they heard. We encourage voters to get to know these candidates and support their campaigns.

1st Circuit, 2nd District, SubDistrict 1, Division A
Christopher Hester

Beyond Hester’s extensive reliance upon the trial lawyer cabal to fund his campaign, perhaps only slightly less alarming is the fact that the Louisiana AFL-CIO, hardly an organization to closely align itself with LABI and its endorsed candidates, has also endorsed Hester as evidenced by the following Hester campaign material:

Let’s take a moment to view Burns’ concerns over LABI’s Hester endorsement both from the vantage point of Hester’s extensive reliance upon the Louisiana trial lawyer cabal to fund his campaign and Hester’s endorsement by the AFL-CIO:

Burns expresses his concerns over the LABI and AFL-CIO endorsements of Chris Hester for the open seat on the First Circuit Court of Appeal.

As mentioned on the preceding video, at 9:17 a.m. on Monday, October 19, 2020, we called LABI President Stephen Waguespack and left him a voicemail offering him the opportunity to contact us and state on-the-record why LABI had a high level of comfort with Hester given his extensive reliance upon the Louisiana trial lawyer cabal to finance his campaign and also the AFL-CIO endorsement of Hester.  We indicated we’d keep the window open until close of business on October 19, 2020 to hear back from Waguespack and, at 3:53 p.m., LABI PAC Director Bo Staples did call us.

Staples emphasized that the endorsement of Hester was made prior to the campaign finance reports being released and that, with the benefit of those reports, LABI may have requested a “follow up” with Hester.  Staples emphasized that, “through the questionnaire and interviewing process” that both Johanna Landreneau and Chris Hester were candidates that LABI “liked.”  He then stressed that he felt the need to issue a sole endorsement because of the “shifting demographics” of the district.  Staples then emphasized that, “it is not a sure thing that the district will remain in Republican hands.”  He said that the vote would likely end up being 52-48, “if Melanie (Jones – the sole Democratic candidate in the race) doesn’t win outright (in the primary).”

Staples further stressed that Hester’s endorsement was based upon Hester, “being the only judge in the race.”  He emphasized that Hester is the only one who has won an election having run twice and prevailing in one election.  He also said that Jones had run, “at least once, maybe twice” and that she had failed to win an election, and he stressed that Landreneau, “has never run in an election.”  He concluded by indicating that LABI feels that Hester is the most “electable” of the two Republicans in the race.

For anyone wishing to examine the other candidates’ campaign finance reports, here they are:  Johanna Landreneau’s campaign finance report and Melanie Newkome Jones’ campaign finance report.  In examining them, we certainly don’t see any reliance upon trial lawyers to finance the campaigns of either of these two Hester opponents in the race.  Meanwhile, here’s a table summarizing Hester’s extensive reliance upon the Louisiana trial lawyer cabal to finance his campaign:

So, by our math, a total of $45,750 out of Hester’s $85,575 in funds raised, or 53 percent, was derived from the Louisiana trial lawyer cabal.  That’s just a tad (okay, more than a tad!) too rich of influence by the trial lawyer cabal which has kept Louisiana in a “judicial hell hole” for decades for our blood.  In short, we don’t have a comfort level, given his extensive reliance upon the trial lawyer cabal to fund his campaign, with him being the next judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeal.

For the most part, we at Sound Off Louisiana are extremely supportive of LABI’s endorsements because they do not hand them out lightly.  Nevertheless, under these circumstances, we are letting this particular endorsement go in one ear and straight out the other, and we are openly endorsing Johanna Landreneau for the vacancy on the First Circuit Court of Appeal.

If you would like to be added to our Sound Off Louisiana email list to be notified of future posts, simply go to our home page and scroll to the bottom (mobile devices) or to the top of the right-hand column (desktops).  Supply your email address within the subscribe box.  You’ll then receive an automated email from Word Press, and all you have to do is click on the blue “confirm follow” bar contained within that email, and you’ll begin receiving great posts such as the preceding one above.