Will Ben Crump’s insertion into Greene case, particularly with his assistant, Arthur “Silky Slim – ‘justice came when Gavin Long came'” Reed tagging along, actually impede the family’s quest for justice?

After declaring he’d come to “piss on your Confederacy” referencing then EBRP Mayor Pro-Tem Scott Wilson, and also declaring that, “Justice came when Gavin Long came,” Arthur “Sliky Slim” Reed, who is directly employed by prominent national Civil Rights attorney Ben Crump and who has been by his side at two recent Ronald Greene rallies, is escorted out of the East Baton Rouge Parish Metro Council meeting in July of 2017.

We doubt anyone will question our dedication to coverage of the Ronald Greene in-custody death at the hands of Louisiana State Police (LSP) on May 10, 2019.  From our initial coverage and breaking of the matter on September 10, 2020 through covering in excruciating detail the happenings at the criminal defense trial in Farmerville, Louisiana, we’ve tried to be as blunt and thorough as we possibly can.

As everyone is aware, at the last court hearing on August 22, 2023, we focused on the minutia of each defendant’s proceedings and only notated in passing the fact that prominent civil rights attorney Ben Crump had been retained by the Greene family.  In sharp contrast, Crump’s signing on the case seemed to be all that the mainstream media focused upon.

We intend to be equally blunt today in our assessment of Crump’s entry into this matter, which we’re now prepared to declare a major impediment toward the Greene family obtaining justice in Louisiana, either from a criminal or civil standpoint.

Very long-time subscribers to this blog will recall this August 17, 2017 feature entailing what we assessed as “bad optics for Gov. John Bel Edwards.”

That feature highlighted what we consider horrendous episodes being conducted by Crump Law Firm Paralegal and Investigator Arthur “Silky Slim” Reed.  It was Reed who openly condoned the killing of four (4) Baton Rouge police officers, three of whom died instantly and a fourth, Nick Tullier, who lingered for years in a Houston hospital paralyzed for years before finally passing away on May 5, 2022 from the ambush he endured six years before at the hands of Gavin Long.  It was Long who made his way down from Kanas City, Missouri and ambushed the Baton Rouge Police Officers (one of whom was black) on July 17, 2016.

At this time, let’s take a look at “Silky Slim’s” abhorrent statement and conduct before the East Baton Rouge Parish Metro Council in July of 2017.  In fact, we’re going to invoke Crump’s own slogan:  “Don’t say no ‘mo, just watch this video.”


July, 2017 EBRP Council Meeting:  Arthur “Silky Slim” Reed fully justifies Gavin Long’s actions as, “an eye for an eye” and emphasized that, “justice came when Gavin Long came!”

As indicated, we’re going to be very blunt and emphatic about our thoughts entailing Crump entering the scene and having the unmitigated gall to have “Silky Slim” stand around at last week’s rally at the Louisiana State Capital on Wednesday, September 27, 2023 (and a similar rally on August 22, 2023 in Farmerville)!  We view Reed’s commentary above as repulsive, despicable, inexcusable, and abhorrent!  Furthermore, the proper thing for Crump to have done if he felt so strongly the need to have Reed appear with him at these functions would have been to have Reed himself make an honest and sincere apology to every citizen of Baton Rouge for the highly-offensive comments that he made in the video above!

Being blunt, Reed’s appearance back here in the city where he generated such extreme animosity six years ago was nothing short of revolting to us!  We are not happy in the slightest to see this quest for justice for Ronald Greene stoop to such a low level!

We’ve never seen the first person openly cheer and justify the killing of Ronald Greene (nor should they), but to condone Reed’s inflammatory remarks on the video above wherein he condones the killing of three (ultimately four) Baton Rouge Police officers is a direct slap in the face to every police officer Long ambushed; furthermore, it’s a direct slap in the face to every family member and friend of Nick Tullier and their six-year battle that they fought along side him after being left almost-totally paralyzed (just look at the pictures on the link above which we’re duplicating now for convenience)!  Tullier’s father, James, actually set up an RV next to Our Lady of the Lake Hospital so he could stay close to his beloved son in the immediate aftermath of Long’s despicable act!  To see “Slim’s” commentary above and see him reappearing in the very city in which he made the disgusting and inexcusable commentary is beyond repulsive!  It’s downright sickening.

Now, we want to go ahead and include a few more videos of “Silky – ‘justice came when Gavin Long came’ – Slim” and the pure filth and garbage that spewed out of his mouth during the same timeframe as the above video:


Slim, in demanding the resignation of former EBRP Mayor-President Melven “Kip” Holden, curses the very God he claims he now serves after having become a Christian upon release from his prison sentence.

Slim provides yet more “bad optics” for Edwards (now Greene family?) at an 8/10/17 meeting of the EBRP Metro Council.

Referring back to Wednesday’s rally, it was very sparsely attended, with most of the attendees being members arriving from out-of-state representing Black Lives Matter and the Black Panthers, with many of the same names and faces being  present at every rally we’ve attended.  Our point is that the number of folk from the local area has been miniscule.  That’s understandable in Farmerville, but Baton Rouge is a huge metropolitan area!  We would suggest that large crowds are failing to materialize as a direct result of Crump’s entry into the equation but, more disturbingly, that Arthur “Silky Slim” Reed would be brought right back into a city (Baton Rouge) that few people, either from the black community or the white community, want anything to do with!  It’s that simple!

Now, we’re about to make a few statements in assessing Crump’s involvement in this matter and why we view it as a huge negative for any potential for the Greene family to obtain justice, either on the criminal or civil front, but first, we want to present a brief video of Crump responding to a question by Sound Off Louisiana founder Robert Burns about the fact that the Feds already had the Ronald Greene case for a protracted period before turning it over to Union Parish DA John Belton.  Here’s Burns’ question and Crump’s response (Note:  Silky briefly enters the picture at the 0:24 mark of the video):


August 22, 2023 (after Union Parish Court hearing):  Crump responds to question by Burns entailing why the Feds failed to obtain indictments after having the case for a rather protracted period (Note:  Silky briefly enters the picture at the 0:24 mark of the video).

Okay.  Now for our observations:

— Even if the Feds do opt to pursue charges in the Greene matter after its initial foray which entailed a rather protracted period in which they came up empty, only the Defense, NOT the Prosecution, can request a Change of Venue!  From the just-linked feature:

3. The rule provides for a change of venue only on defendant’s motion and does not extend the same right to the prosecution, since the defendant has a constitutional right to a trial in the district where the offense was committed. Constitution of the United States, Article III, Sec. 2, Par. 3; Amendment VI.

Trust us, the Defense is perfectly content to try the case in the Western District of Louisiana, and the prosecution (i.e. the Feds) is hamstrung in being able to move any such trial.  As was demonstrated on August 2, 2023 entailing former LSP Trooper Jacob Brown’s trial entailing Aaron Bowman’s beating, that’s a tough venue in which to prevail.  Further, just as Brown flooded the Federal courtroom with friends and family (which is his legal right to do and also their legal right to attend), expect the same should any future criminal trial of the officers involved in the Ronald Greene matter ever materialize.

— As stated on the feature above, Brown would have been perfectly content with a hung jury, and his attorney, Michael DuBos, readily told all of his family and friends while the jury was deliberating that the Feds would be highly unlikely to retry the case.  It’s our belief that the Feds are likely to assess the same uphill battle entailing Greene and yet another Federal Grand Jury.  It’s already a very high hill to climb, and folk (i.e. potential jurors) aren’t likely to be favorably influenced by the introduction of Crump (and most especially not “Silky Slim”) into the equation.  As DuBos pointed out to those he addressed in the courtroom on August 2, 2023, the Feds don’t have infinite resources to keep throwing at one case.  They aren’t going to proceed with a case they feel they can’t win, and the fact of the matter is that the case MUST be tried in Federal Court in the Western District because the prosecution is hamstrung entailing any ability to move the case.  Furthermore, the prosecution must be able to convince itself that it can obtain 12 jurors, all of whom would be required to vote “guilty” to obtain a conviction.  While that’s not totally impossible given the venue, it’s an extremely tall order, and we saw that in the Bowman case where only one juror held out (“Ms. Reluctant”), and she ultimately found Jacob Brown “not guilty.”

— Likewise, any civil trial will have to take place in the Federal courthouse in the Western District of Louisiana (we recently provided an update to the civil trial near the end of this feature).  The minimum number of jurors for that is six (6) and, unless agreed to by both Plaintiff and Defendant. the verdict must be unanimous.  The Defendants in the Greene civil case would almost certainly never agree to anything less than a unanimous verdict entailing any civil judgment.  The defense attorneys will most assuredly stress the fact that Greene was alluding law enforcement at speeds in excess of 100 MPH and will likely try to introduce the fact that at least one autopsy referenced, “cocaine-induced delirium.”  Even though Plaintiff attorneys can try through the jury selection process to obtain a jury deemed most favorable in its eyes to Greene, we believe prospective jurors will have a hard time blocking people like “Silky Slim” from their minds even if they may claim they can’t recall his name or anything about him.  In Baton Rouge, more people recognize “Silky Slim” than will recognize Crump!  On that, we can assure anyone!

— Even upon a successful civil judgment, the Louisiana Legislature must appropriate the money to pay the judgment.  Prior to the “Silky Slim” injection, we would have figured that would be a given, but now we’re not so sure.  After all, victims of the 1983 floods in Louisiana wound up having to wait 40 YEARS to obtain $130 million of the $300 million in judgments (with interest) they’d obtained!

Obviously, the Greene family’s euphoria over Crump’s insertion into its quest for justice notwithstanding, we think his insertion is a net hindrance toward that justice, and we almost-assuredly know that the insertion of Arthur “Silky Slim” Reed is!  What do we know though, huh?

The September 27, 2023 rally was largely a copy and paste of features we’ve presented from Farmerville, so we’re not uploading the video of it; however, for anyone who wishes to see the video, we’re going to lean upon Jason Arceneaux’s feature on Unfiltered with Kiran in providing this video link for anyone who may wish to view it.

Lastly, we have called the Union Parish Clerk of Court several times since the August 22, 2023 hearing to see if Judge Rogers may have issued a ruling on LSP Trooper Kory York’s Kastigar filing by his attorney, J. Michael Small.  Our last such call was on Thursday, September 28, 2023.  We were told that no ruling has been rendered.  It’s possible Judge Rogers may simply wait until the next court hearing on October 12, 2023 and issue his ruling in open court.  Unless a ruling transpires before then, we’ll certainly attend that court hearing and report upon his ruling.  We’ve already stated our belief that he’s going to grant the Motion to Quash, and that DA John Belton and his own prosecutorial ineptitude which is responsible for that fact.

Kelsey Delatte alleges she was raped by Councilman’s son, provides audio evidence of Sheriff Webre all but acknowledging it along with him “victim shaming” her by stating “nobody believes her,” challenging her to have “Kiran (Chawla) come on…..Come on Chris (Nakamoto).”

Ascension Parish Sheriff Bobby Webre.

The following video is self-produced by Kelsey Delatte, who alleges that she was raped by an Ascension Parish Councilman’s son on October 2, 2021:


Kelsey Delatte provides brief video describing an alleged rape and the immediate aftermath.

In the following video, Ascension Parish Sheriff Candidate C. J. Matthews addresses how the matter was handled by incumbent Sheriff Bobby Webre and District Attorney Ricky Babin:


September 26, 2023:  C. J. Matthews explains the circumstances of Delatte’s alleged rape and the subsequent handling of the matter by incumbent Sheriff Bobby Webre and District Attorney Ricky Babin.

As referenced near the end of the above video, we are providing separately the audio recordings of Webre which are contained in the video above.  Here they are in the order Matthews spoke of them:


Webre reveals to Delatte that, “they found three drugs in your system.”

As noted in the Matthews video above, Delatte is adamant that she does not use any non-prescription drugs at all, and Matthews indicates that Webre, “came close to accusing her of using drugs.”

In the above audio, a friend of Delatte’s indicates, “did they drug her?”  She then describes that as, “great news,” to which Webre replies, “You think so?”

The reality, however, is that Webre apparently had no idea how to read a simple toxicology report!

We have examined the toxicology report, and it reveals the presence of nothing more than ethanol at a rate of 95 mg/dL (milligrams per deci liter).  Her Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) was 0.095 g/mL (grams per milli liter), which is slightly above the legal driving limit of 0.08 g/mL.

Delatte reports that the samples were taken after a protracted period and also after episodes of vomiting.  Both factors may have likely contributed to a relatively low BAC at the time of the sample vs. what it may have been at the time she alleges she was raped.  What’s disturbing, however, is Webre point-blank falsely stating that, “they found three drugs in your system!”  Nevertheless, the audio file above is very clear, and it’s clearly his voice saying it!

Further, someone on the audio above seems to say, “the report I got says blood alcohol.”  We are aware of only one report, so apparently, that individual, whomever he is, is able to actually read a toxicology report!

Now for the audio in which Matthews indicates Webre “victim shamed” Delatte and, when Delatte indicated that maybe the media needed to become involved, Webre bristled and said, “Come on Kiran (Chawla) come see the file…..Come on Chris (Nakamoto)…..”


Webre becomes pretty irate when Delatte expresses frustration at the lack of progress on prosecution on her case and, after referencing that she may need to get the media involved, Webre challenges her to do so in stating, “Kiran (Chawla) come see the file…..Chris (Nakamoto), come see the file.”

Subsequent to the filming of the video above, Delatte also provided an audio clip of Webre appearing to all but acknowledge that Delatte was in fact raped.  Let’s listen to that four-second clip:

Webre is heard clearly stating, “that still don’t give him the right to rape her.”

 As she states in the initial video to this feature, Delatte has been very frustrated at the manner in which her entire matter has been handled.  On July 21, 2023, she made a public records request of Webre’s office for, “all documentation concerning the telephone records of Sheriff Robert “Bobby” Webre from October 2, 2021-October 31, 2021.”  The response the Sheriff’s Office provided follows (at least he placed that one on letterhead!):

As we mention in the video above, we look forward to delivering segment two of the Delatte matter in coming days!

Brandi Melissa, whose two older brothers were allegedly molested by a student at Jimmy Swaggart Bible College, wants question in Thursday’s debate to focus on child predator prosecutions and for Lundy to indicate whether the late evangelist Gorman’s family would endorse him.

Sex offender registration of Todd Michael Duquette, who was recently released from prison in Louisiana after having molested several young boys to include, according to Brandi Melissa, two older brothers of hers during her family’s affiliation with Jimmy Swaggart Ministries and its youth program in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Over the course of this blog’s eight-plus year existence, we’ve come across people we’ve interviewed who have the material they present extremely well-organized.  Corey delaHoussaye and C. J. Matthews come immediately come to mind.

Soon after we published our feature on our back-handed endorsement of Jeff Landry for Governor, we were contacted by someone who takes the championship trophy for being organized.  Her name is Brandi Melissa, and she contacted us soon after seeing our just-linked feature with particular intrigue on our reference to candidate Hunter Lundy.  Specifically, Melissa was stunned to see that we were the first to bring up the fact that Lundy was the attorney representing the late-evangelist Marvin Gorman, who sued Baton Rouge televangelist Jimmy Swaggart for $90 million for defamation.  As Sound Off Louisiana founder Robert Burns stated on the video on that feature, “It was that trial which put Hunter Lundy on the map!”

We want to be even more blunt than that!  Absent the world-wide notoriety Lundy obtained from suing Swaggart, he likely would remain a small-time, ambulance-chasing, slip-and-fall-grocery-store-hovering no name attorney in a small Lake Charles office.  Even Lundy himself readily admits that it was Swaggart who put Lundy on the map.

For those too young to remember (and we’re going to try to keep this narrative as brief as possible because there are web pages all over creation on just what all took place), here’s a quick rundown of the happenings between Swaggart and Gorman:

—  July 15, 1986:  Swaggart calls Gorman, a rising star in the evangelistic world who posed a direct threat to the undisputed king of that arena (Swaggart), to his Highland Road Mansion and confronts him entailing an extra-marital affair Gorman had with a member of his congregation in New Orleans.

— Swaggart, accompanied by numerous associates reinforcing his demand, insists that Gorman report himself to Assemblies of Gods (AOG) Headquarters in Springfield, Missouri and agree to undergo rehabilitation.  Gorman does so and loses his credentials as an AOG ordained Minister.

— Early to mid 1987:  The Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker’s Ministry, Praise the Lord (PTL), in North Carolina collapses in spectacular fashion when AOG officials receive a credible report of Bakker having an affair with church secretary Jessica Hahn and that $279,000 was paid to Hahn (about $725,000 in today’s money) via ministry hush money for her to keep quiet about it.  Hahn, a 28-year-old knockout, was also reportedly paid $1 million ($2.6 million in today’s dollars) to pose for a Playboy centerfold Bakker’s Ministry also committed fraud in overselling “partnerships” entailing followers being able to spend nights at its famed theme park and hotel, Heritage USA.  Bakker accused Swaggart of attempting a “hostile takeover” (they were all the rage of corporate America back then with financing typically being comprised of Michael Milken’s “junk bonds,” something Donald Trump was very, very fond of) of his Ministry, a claim Swaggart vehemently denied in stating, “Nowhere in the bible do I see where a preacher should be in the amusement park business.”  Swaggart did admit, however, that he would have keen interest in Bakker’s extensive television outreach to help further his own mission of, “spreading of the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.”  Bakker was subsequently sentenced to Federal prison but released after a few years and actually still pitches various “doomsday products” deemed required to survive the catastrophes he foresees coming upon all of humanity (no doubt as a “message from God.”)

— On or about Summer, 1987 (or perhaps even before):  Marvin Gorman’s son, a Sheriff’s Deputy, is told by prostitute Debra Murphree, whom he dealt with on a regular basis, “You know I’m dating Jimmy Swaggart.”  Gorman’s son thought she was nuts but, when she kept persisting that she was in fact, “dating Jimmy Swaggart,” he decided there was nothing to lose in setting up a sting (he was obviously far more effective at stings than the bone-headed idiot deputies working for Ascension Parish Sheriff Bobby “this will all just be a week in the newspaper” Webre)!

—  October 16, 1987:  Gorman’s son obtains damning photos of Swaggart (though he tried to disguise himself somewhat in a tennis outfit with the headband to match) exiting Murphree’s run-down, seedy, by-the-hour, motel room in the red light district on Airline Highway in Metairie (the motel has since been torn down).  To buy time for his father to arrive, Gorman’s son lets the air out of Swaggart’s right rear tire.  Swaggart, perhaps not even as mechanically inclined as Sound Off’s Burns, attempts to change the tire and actually places the rim on backwards until he uncovered it wouldn’t work that way in tightening the lug nuts (though that may have been from sheer nervousness).  Gorman arrives on the scene and says, “Jimmy Swaggart!”  Swaggart responds, “Marvin, what are you doing here?”  Gorman responds with, “No, I think the more interesting question is what are YOU doing here?”

— A subsequent private meeting between Swaggart, his wife Frances, and Gorman transpires during which Gorman alleges Swaggart offered Gorman a lucrative position at his Ministry.  According to Gorman, Swaggart’s wife, Frances, had one singular focus:  convincing Gorman to drop a civil lawsuit against Swaggart (more on that shortly).  Gorman alleges that he rebuffed Swaggart’s proposal and instead informed Swaggart that he was giving him three (3) months to self-report to AOG just as Swaggart had demanded Gorman do at that infamous July 15, 1986 meeting.  Swaggart declined to do so (obviously not knowing Gorman had the incriminating photos), so Gorman turned the photos over to AOG National Officials, who ultimately directed Swaggart to step down for one year and, in a crushing blow, insisted that he could not air historical crusade services during that one-year period.  The Louisiana Assemblies of God attempted to flex what little muscle it had and stated that three months was sufficient.  Swaggart agreed to serve the three-month hiatus, but ultimately he, his son, Donnie, and other officials at Jimmy Swaggart Ministries surrendered their credentials with Swaggart becoming non-denominational and declaring in the famous, “I have sinned against you My Lord,” service at his Baton Rouge Church, Family Worship Center, that, “For those who have asked, ‘will the Ministry continue?,’ yes, the Ministry will continue!”

Okay.  That provides the backdrop to lead up to the point that Melissa, then a young child, was exposed to witnessing first-hand (along with her late mother) the abuse of her two older brothers at the hands of a child sexual predator, Todd Michael Duquette, at a time when Duquette was deemed by Jimmy Swaggart Ministries to be a very valued member of its youth program.  He was also a student at Jimmy Swaggart Bible College, which was renamed World Evangelism Fellowship in the immediate aftermath of the Murphree prostitute scandal, and the Bible College valued every single student it could have because the college became a ghost college in the aftermath of the scandal (with reports of total enrollment approaching the teens – as in below 20).  For those who may not be aware, Swaggart was again caught by law enforcement in Indio, California on or around October 12, 1991 soliciting another prostitute, Rosemary Garcia, only two days after his anniversary celebration with his wife, Frances, on October 10, 1991.  After that encounter, the late-Clyde Fuller, a major trucking operator out of Chattanooga, Tennessee, whom the Swaggarts relied upon for guidance and who was a major contributor to the Ministry, reportedly told Frances, “Well, the first thing you’re going to have to do is shut down the bible college.”  That reportedly caused Frances Swaggart to immediately faint upon hearing Fuller’s words.   At any rate, although his son, Donnie, told the Baton Rouge congregation that Swaggart would, “step down for a period,” Swaggart, after having driven by himself straight from California to Baton Rouge without stopping for anything other than gas or to use restrooms (and indicating that, “If I didn’t fear going to Hell, I’d have pulled the car right in front of an oncoming 18-wheeler,”) quickly reversed his son’s declaration and stated that he would not be stepping down at all and further stating to his congregation and the local media that details of his encounter with Garcia, “are flat none of your business!”

Perhaps Swaggart visited with Garcia in sheer frustration of the fact that, on September 10, 1991 (a mere 32 days prior to his encounter with prostitute Garcia), Gorman, who’d filed a defamation suit against Swaggart years earlier (Gorman claimed for Swaggart going after the Ministerial credentials of his children) obtained a $10 million civil judgment from a New Orleans jury.  The case had previously been dismissed at the trial court level due to an alleged violation of Swaggart’s First Amendment rights; however, Gorman kept the damning photos a secret even from his own lawyer (Lundy).  The day before appeal court arguments, the existence of the damning photos was revealed and plastered to media outlets literally all over the world.  That act by Gorman threw the appeal oral arguments into disarray, and Gubernatorial candidate Hunter Lundy was by then well on his way to celebrity stardom as the attorney who took down the mighty Rev. Jimmy Lee Swaggart.  Subsequently at a civil trial, the jury awarded Gorman $10 million in damages.  The case was ultimately settled out of court for $1.85 million (approximately $4.8 million today’s dollars), likely resulting in about a $600,000 or so payday for Lundy (approximately $1.5 million in today’s dollars).  Not only did Lundy profit handsomely from the Swaggart civil trial, but he also published “Let Us Prey entailing the whole scandal.  Approximately 13 years later, sometime in 2004, Lundy noticed that Gorman was preaching at a venue only an hour away.  Lundy, who graduated from the Christian School Millsaps College in Jackson, Mississippi, decided he wanted to attend.  Lundy would describe the service as a “transformative moment,” after which he became “close friends” with Gorman and, in 2009, Gorman ordained Lundy (perhaps ironic since Gorman himself, along with Swaggart, had both been defrocked by AOG) to preach the Gospel.

With all of that as the background (and we tried to condense it as best we could), let us now present Melissa’s frustration not only at debate moderators’ unwillingness to pose a question pertaining to Lundy’s representation of Gorman, but also her frustration at the fact that the State of Louisiana failed to inform her that Duquette was released from prison until two days after he was released rather than the 60-day advanced notice she was supposed to obtain.  She also expresses her desires for every member at the debate on Thursday, September 28, 2023 to address strengthening the prosecution of child predators and being forced to serve out their sentences.  Here’s our interview with Melissa:


September 25, 2023:  Brandi Melissa covers her trauma and that of her family at the hands of Jimmy Swaggart Ministries’ Bible College student Todd Michael Duquette at Jimmy Swaggart Ministries in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Now let’s provide all of the material (historical articles from The Advocate archives as well as features from WBRZ’s Investigative Unit with Chris Nakamoto et. al. and her own personal testimony before a Louisiana State Senate Committee which Melissa provided to us as part of this feature).  Here they are:

First, from The Advocate archives:

Man accused of sex crimes with juveniles

Publication date:  6/3/1993 Page:  1-B; S Section:  NEWS Edition:

Byline:

 

Sheriff’s deputies arrested a former student from Jimmy Swaggart Bible College and accused him Wednesday of sex crimes involving juveniles, an East Baton Rouge Sheriff’s Office spokesman said. Todd Michael Duquette, 27, of 8686 Coy Ave., Apt. No. 5, was booked on 49 counts stemming from acts he allegedly performed with five boys between 8 and 12 years old, Lt. Col. Mike Barnett said. The acts allegedly occurred between last summer and last month, when the boys spent nights at the suspect’s house, Barnett said. Duquette is a friend of the boys’ parents, Barnett said. Deputies booked Duquette with 17 counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile, 20 counts of oral sexual battery, four counts of aggravated crime against nature and eight counts of sexual battery, booking records show. Duquette remained in Parish Prison Wednesday with bond set at$2,500, a prison spokesman said. A spokeswoman at Swaggart’s Bible college, now called World Evangelism Bible College and Seminary, confirmed that Duquette attended the school. However, Linda Westbrook did not know when Duquette was a student there, she said.

———————————-

Ex-Swaggart Bible student admits molesting five boys

Publication date:  2/12/1994 Page:  7-C S Section:  NEWS Edition:

Byline:

A former student at the Jimmy Swaggart Bible College accused of engaging in sexual misconduct with young boys pleaded guilty Friday to multiple counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile. Todd Michael Duquette, 27, of 8686 Coy Ave., was accused of inappropriate sexual behavior with five boys aged 8-12, according to Assistant District Attorney Sue Bernie. The incidents occurred between June 1992 and May 1993 when the victims spent the night at Duquette’s house, authorities said. Duquette was a friend of the boys’ parents. Duquette was booked last June with a total of 49 counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile and other charges. He pleaded guilty to four counts of indecent behavior as well as one count of oral sexual battery, Bernie said. State District Judge Mike Erwin ordered a presentence investigation and scheduled sentencing for May 19. Duquette faces maximum prison sentences of seven years on each of the indecent behavior charges and 15 years for oral sexual battery.

—————————-

 

CRIMINAL COURT RECORDS

Publication date:  8/31/1994 Page:  6-C; S Section:  NEWS Edition:

Byline:

July 28, 1994

 

The following felony and DWI trials, pleas, sentencings, fine hearings and bench warrants were handled in the Criminal Sections of the 19th Judicial District Court on July 28, 1994 (reassignments, motions, arraignments, traffic and other misdemeanors not included):

 

Section III – Todd Michael DuQuette, Count I: four counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile; Count II: oral sexual battery. Pleaded guilty. Court sentenced DuQuette to five years at hard labor on each count consecutive as to Count I. Count II: serve 10 years at hard labor, consecutive with Count I, with credit for time served. Court suspended sentence and placed DuQuette on active, supervised probation for five years on each count, concurrent, with special conditions: refrain from criminal conduct; Teen Challenge in Michigan; have no unsupervised contact with teens.

 

—————————-

 

Sex offender jailed over notification law *** Ex-Bible student to enter rehabilitation program

Publication date:  11/15/1994 Page:  9-A;S Section:  NEWS Edition:

Byline:  TIM TALLEY

 

A convicted sex offender who ignored a requirement to notify neighbors and school officials was sent to the Parish Prison on Monday until he is transferred to a rehabilitation center in Michigan. “You’re going from the Sheriff’s Office to the bus station,” state District Judge Mike Erwin said during a brief probation review hearing for Todd Michael Duquette, 28, of 8845 Coy, No. 10. Erwin scheduled the hearing for Duquette last week after a television news report disclosed that he had violated the state’s Sex Offender Notification Law since he was placed on probation in July. As a condition of his probation, Duquette was ordered to enroll in a rehabilitation program in Flint, Mich., known as “Teen Challenge,” his court-appointed defense attorney, Randy Buckley, said. But the deadline for entering the program was extended informally while Duquette worked to raise money for a bus ticket, he said. In addition, Duquette did not report his conviction. The Sex Offender Notification Law requires a defendant convicted of certain sex crimes involving victims under 18 to report his name, his address and the nature of the crime to the local school superintendent and to residents within a three-square block area of his home. Erwin said Duquette was told to comply with the law, but that information was excluded from the official record of his sentencing. “He knew what it was,” Erwin said during the hearing. “He got around it for a little while, but he won’t get around it anymore.” Duquette, a former student at the Jimmy Swaggart Bible College, was accused of engaging in sexual misconduct with young boys. He pleaded guilty to four counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile and one count of oral sexual battery, according to Assistant District Attorney Sue Bernie. Erwin sentenced Duquette to a total of 30 years in prison but suspended the sentence and placed him on active supervised probation for a total of five years, according to court records. Conditions of his probation include participation in the Michigan rehabilitation program and refraining from unsupervised contact with teens, the records indicate.

And now for all of the recent WBRZ Investigative Features:

 Child Sex Predator Denied Parole and Had Residence Plan Revoked Released from Prison 15 Years Early

 Child Molesters Should Not Be Eligible for Good Behavior Time

Bible College Child Molester Loses Residence Plan Hours Before Good Behavior Release

And now for her own personal testimony:

 Personal Louisiana Senate Committee Testimony of Brandi Melissa on Deterring Sex Offenses Against Children

 Personal Louisiana Senate Committee Testimony of Brandi Melissa on Deterring Sex Offenses Against Children 2

Testimony of Crime Victim Advocate and Child Sex Abuse Survivor

Melissa also has a bit to chime in on regarding the Louisiana Secretary of State’s race and one of the candidates, Brandon Trosclair.  Let’s take a look:

Louisiana Secretary of State Candidate Attends Church That Protects Child Sex Predators

For those who may not know, Trosclair is one of those “conspiracy theorists” who believes that Louisiana elections have been ripe with fraud and wants the state to resort to paper ballots as a means to “safeguard” its election results.  He’s following a much broader “outreach” in that regard in which Donnie Swaggart, Jimmy’s son, openly seeks for persons attending his church meetings across the nation to purchase famed Mike Lindell (yeah, the pillow guy)’s book.  At any rate, with the last poll we saw showing Trosclair at about two percent, we don’t think many folk are going to have to sweat him being Louisiana’s next Secretary of State.

Also, Melissa makes reference to a bond reduction hearing for former Catholic Priest Lawrence Heckler.  Here’s the link for that WWL feature by David Hammer.

 For those with YouTube accounts, feel free to subscribe to Melissa’s YouTube videos here.

We look forward to Thursday night’s debate and, more specifically, as to whether the LPB moderators will ask a question directed at the candidates entailing laws to ensure more forceful enforcement of sentencing and serving out of those sentences when it comes to violating young children.  As Melissa makes abundantly clear in our video interview above, contrary to Ascension Parish Bobby “it will only be a week in the newspaper,” Webre, the fallout for the victims of such predators is extremely traumatic, and it’s lifelong!